腹腔镜经腰腹联合途径行较大肾上腺肿瘤切除的临床研究
-
摘要: 目的 研究腹腔镜新的手术路径——经腰腹联合途径切除较大肾上腺肿瘤的临床安全性和有效性。方法 直径≥6.0 cm的肾上腺肿瘤分别采用经腹腹腔镜(\n=30)和腹腔镜经腰腹联合途径(\n=30)行肾上腺肿瘤切除。收集并比较两组间基本资料、手术中数据、手术后数据和随访资料。结果 两组患者基本情况相似,基线相同。两种不同入路的手术方式的中转开放率、估计出血量、输血率、手术时间、副损伤、血压心率波动和术中心脑血管并发症等术中指标,两组间差异无统计学意义(\P>0.05);术后引流量、拔除引流管时间、术后住院时间、术后镇痛药物使用、发热、感染、肠梗阻和其他术后并发症等术后指标,两组间差异无统计学意义(\P>0.05)。经腰腹联合入路组在肠功能恢复开始进食时间和开始下床活动时间略有优势,但两组差异仍无统计学意义(\P>0.05)。两种不同入路的手术方式的肿瘤手术后期治疗方式、肿瘤复发率、转移率和生存率等术后随访指标,两组间差异无统计学意义(\P>0.05)。结论 经腹膜后而又完全打开侧腹膜的腹腔镜经腰腹联合途径行较大肾上腺肿瘤切除安全有效,具有临床推广的价值。
-
关键词:
- 腹腔镜肾上腺肿瘤经腰腹联合入路手术
Abstract: Objective To explore the safety and efficacy of trans-lumbar-and-peritoneally joint (TLPJ) approach for laparoscopic dissection of large neoplasms from adrenal glands. Methods Sixty patients with diameters ≥ 6.0 cm adrenal neoplasms were recruited in this study. Of the participants, 30 were given transperitoneally laparoscopic adenectomy and 30 were given TLPJ approach. We compared the basic characteristics of the patients, as well as their conditions during and after operations. Results The two groups of patients had similar characteristics. No significant differences were found between the two approaches in terms of conversion to open surgery, estimated blood loss, transfusion, operating time, side injury, fluctuations of heart rate and blood pressure, and vascular accidents (\P>0.05), although slight, but not significant, advantages were shown in the TLPJ patients on starting food intake and physical activities. Similar results were also found in drainage volume, time to remove drainage, length of hospital stay, usage of analgesic, fever incidence, infection and intestinal obstruction etc (\P>0.05). Above all, no significant differences were found between the two groups in recurrence, metastasis and overall survival rates (\P>0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopic surgery with TLPJ approach, translumbar combined with entirely side peritoneum opened, is safe and efficient compared with the traditional transperitoneal approach for patients with large adrenal neoplasms. -
-
期刊类型引用(13)
1. 张瑞,路露,丁文凯,芦鸿雁,吴珍珍,王文瑞. 新失能老年患者住院期间ADL状况的调查研究. 医学食疗与健康. 2021(03): 16-18+32 . 百度学术
2. 谢静文,陈若珩,陈茂妹. 老年综合评估对老年脑卒中患者营养指标影响因素的分析. 国际医药卫生导报. 2021(04): 519-523 . 百度学术
3. 李秀悦,李晖,尹志勤,卢爱金,郑婷婷,管娅琦. 住院ADL依赖老年患者出院后功能恢复的预测因素. 护理学杂志. 2019(06): 102-105 . 百度学术
4. 席俊彦,杨莹,谢明. 养老机构下高龄老人认知功能与日常生活能力的相关性. 中国老年学杂志. 2019(08): 2010-2012 . 百度学术
5. 李晖,李秀悦,尹志勤,管娅琦,郑婷婷. 住院新失能老人出院前家庭照顾者的照顾能力状况及其影响因素. 温州医科大学学报. 2019(05): 344-349+355 . 百度学术
6. 王鹏,崔云婧,翟雪靓,张少景,李放. 老年住院病人潜在不适当用药与躯体功能状态相关性研究. 实用老年医学. 2019(09): 912-916 . 百度学术
7. 王玉娇,杨浩,张娟,金珊,黄晓峰,王飞,谢道俊. 参芪醒脑颗粒治疗阿尔茨海默病临床研究. 中医药临床杂志. 2017(05): 699-703 . 百度学术
8. 张新胜,马新安. 老年脑卒中营养不良危险因素分析. 蚌埠医学院学报. 2017(07): 950-951 . 百度学术
9. 王英,陈茜,张泽梅,冯冬梅. 品管圈活动在提高老年住院患者Barthel自理能力中的应用. 华西医学. 2017(07): 1064-1068 . 百度学术
10. 宋晓琳,靳修,芦鸿雁,胡宁宁. 高龄老年病人出院1年内日常生活能力与抑郁状况的相关性分析. 护理研究. 2017(05): 594-597 . 百度学术
11. 周艳,代亚丽,薛素梅. 内科老年住院患者防跌倒认知情况调查. 中国卫生产业. 2017(09): 163-166 . 百度学术
12. 孙苏苏. 老年脑卒中患者营养风险因素分析与对策. 中西医结合心血管病电子杂志. 2017(29): 37-38 . 百度学术
13. 赵芸芸,曾维. 老年脑卒中患者营养现状及营养不良的影响因素. 中国老年学杂志. 2016(10): 2372-2373 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(6)
计量
- 文章访问数: 2295
- HTML全文浏览量: 103
- PDF下载量: 6
- 被引次数: 19