欢迎来到《四川大学学报(医学版)》 2025年6月22日 星期日

超声诊断桡动脉穿刺后发生的血管痉挛及其影响因素分析

田黎丽, 罗朝志, 宋海波

田黎丽, 罗朝志, 宋海波. 超声诊断桡动脉穿刺后发生的血管痉挛及其影响因素分析[J]. 四川大学学报(医学版), 2012, 43(5): 782-785.
引用本文: 田黎丽, 罗朝志, 宋海波. 超声诊断桡动脉穿刺后发生的血管痉挛及其影响因素分析[J]. 四川大学学报(医学版), 2012, 43(5): 782-785.

栏目: 研究报告

超声诊断桡动脉穿刺后发生的血管痉挛及其影响因素分析

  • 摘要: 目的 探讨超声诊断桡动脉穿刺后血管痉挛的发生,并对痉挛进行形态学分类,分析影响血管痉挛类型的因素。 方法 82例行择期心脏手术患者,年龄为14~60岁,窦性心律,常规行桡动脉穿刺术。分别在桡动脉穿刺前及穿刺置管成功后即刻行二维超声检查,在穿刺10 cm范围内的最狭窄处(通常位于针尖)测量舒张末期桡动脉直径,以最狭窄处与穿刺前直径差值≥ 0.20 mm,且与穿刺前相比,狭窄程度≥ 10%判定为痉挛。最狭窄的长度≤ 10 mm判定为痉挛环,最狭窄的长度≥ 50 mm判定为痉挛段。 结果 82例患者中发生血管痉挛60例(73%),其中痉挛环29例(48%),痉挛段31例(52%)。将性别、血管直径、穿刺时间和次数、置管困难纳入多因素logistic回归模型分析,发现除了穿刺时间外(P<0.05),其他因素对血管痉挛类型没有影响。 结论 本实验用超声将动脉穿刺后血管痉挛的类型分为两种,即痉挛环,痉挛段。并且发现随着穿刺时间的延长,血管的痉挛类型越倾向于段状而非环状。

     

  • [1]

    Scheer BV,Perel A,Pfeiffer UJ. Clinical review:complications and risk factors of peripheral arterial catheters used for haemodynamic monitoring in anaesthesia and intensive care medicine. Crit Care,2002;6(3):198-204.

    [2]

    Marek B, Thomas L, Martin J. Radial artery cannulation:a comprehensive review of recent anatomic and physiologic investigations. Anesth Analg,2009;109(6):1763-1781.

    [3]

    Ruiz S, Ramón M, Manuel VG. Radial artery spasm in transradial cardiac catheterization.Assessment of factors related to its occurrence,and of its consequences during follow-up. Rev Esp Cardiol,2005;58(5):504-511.

    [4]

    Spyridon D, Georgios G, Charalampos K. Radial artery flow-mediated dilation predicts arterial spasm during transradial coronary interventions. Catheter Cardio Inter,2010;24(5):1-6.

    [5]

    Ulrich HR,Verschuren SA. Prospective comparative study on the hemodynamic and functional concequences of atery monitoring in intensive care patients on the short and long term. J Crit Care,2006;21(2):193-196.

    [6]

    Evren EH, Yesim A, Acar T. The impact of two arterial catheters, different in diameter and length,on postcannulation radial artery diameter, blood flow, and occlusion in atherosclerotic patients. J Anesth,2009;23(3):347-352.

    [7]

    Shunichi N, Shigeru A, Takayuki S. Ultrasonic assessment of vascular complications in coronary angiography and angioplasty after transradial approach.Am J Cardiol,1999;83(2):180-186.

    [8]

    He GW. Arterial grafts for coronary surgery:vasospasm and patency rate. J Thorac Cardio Sur,2001;121(3):431-433.

    [9]

    Bazemore E, Mann JT. Problems and complications of the transradial approach for coronary interventions:a review. J Invasive Cardiol,2005;17(3):156-159.

    [10]

    Hildick-Smith DJR, Lowe MD, Walsh JT, et al. Coronary angiography from the radial artery-experience, complications and limitations.Int J Cardiol,1998;64(3):231-239.

    [11]

    Barry M, Foulon P, Touati G, et al. Comparative histological and biometric study of the coronary, radial and internal thoracic arteries. Surg Radiol Anat,2003;25(4):284-289.

    [12]

    He GW, Liu ZG. Comparison of nitric oxide release and endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor mediated hyperpolarization between human radial and internal mammary arteries. Circulation,2001;104(1):344-349.

    [13]

    Edmundson A, Mann T. Nonocclusive radial artery injury resulting from transradial coronary interventions:radial artery IVUS. J Invasive Cardiol,2005;17(10):528-531.

    [14]

    Olivier V, Arnaud J, Remy C. Prevention of arterial spasm during percutaneous coronary interventions through radial artery:the spasm study. Catheter Cardio Inte,2006;68(2):231-235.

计量
  • 文章访问数:  3301
  • HTML全文浏览量:  145
  • PDF下载量:  36
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2012-03-15
  • 修回日期:  2012-05-30
  • 发布日期:  2012-09-19

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回