欢迎来到《四川大学学报(医学版)》

KELIM及BRCA突变状态对晚期高级别浆液性卵巢癌中间型肿瘤细胞减灭术预后的影响

Effect of Cancer Antigen-125 Elimination Rate Constant K and BRCA Mutation Status on the Prognosis of Interval Debulking Surgery in Advanced High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨CA125消除速率常数(CA125 elimination rate constant k, KELIM)对接受新辅助化疗联合中间型肿瘤细胞减灭术(neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery,NACT-IDS)的晚期高级别浆液性卵巢癌(high-grade serous ovarian cancer, HGSOC)患者疗效及预后的预测价值,并分析其与乳腺癌易感基因(breast cancer susceptibility gene,BRCA)突变状态的联合预后意义。
    方法 回顾性纳入106例接受NACT-IDS治疗的晚期HGSOC患者。计算NACT期间的KELIM,以1.0为界分为高、低两组。比较两组临床病理特征、R0切除率及铂敏感率。采用Logistic回归分析R0切除的预测因素,采用Kaplan-Meier法和Cox回归分析无进展生存期(progression free survival,PFS)的影响因素。进一步根据KELIM与BRCA状态进行联合分层,分析各亚组的铂耐药复发风险。
    结果 KELIM≥1组R0切除率高于KELIM<1组(77.1% vs 55.2%),差异有统计学意义(P=0.024)。多因素Logistic分析显示,KELIM是R0切除的独立预测因子(OR = 2.922,95% CI: 1.112~7.678)。生存分析显示,KELIM≥1组的PFS长于KELIM<1组(33.0个月 vs 18.0个月),差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001)。多因素Cox回归显示,KELIM≥1与PFS进展风险降低相关(HR = 0.481,95% CI: 0.280~0.826);联合分层分析显示,“KELIM≥1且BRCA阳性”亚组未观察到铂耐药复发(0/21),与KELIM<1且BRCA阴性组相比较,其铂耐药复发风险较低(OR = 0.053,95% CI: 0.003~0.932,P = 0.006)。
    结论 KELIM是预测NACT-IDS患者手术结局和PFS的有效动态标志物。KELIM与BRCA状态联合分层能更精准地识别铂耐药复发风险极低的“双重有利”人群,为晚期HGSOC的个体化治疗与风险分层管理提供重要依据。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective  To investigate the predictive value of the cancer antigen-125 elimination rate constant K (KELIM) for treatment response and prognosis in patients with advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery (NACT-IDS), and to analyze the combined prognostic significance of KELIM and the mutation status of breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA).
    Methods A total of 106 patients with advanced HGSOC who had undergone NACT-IDS were retrospectively enrolled. The KELIM values during neoadjuvant chemotherapy were calculated, and patients were divided into high- and low-KELIM groups using a cutoff value of 1.0. Clinicopathological characteristics, R0 resection rates, and platinum sensitivity rates were compared between the two groups. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictive factors for R0 resection, while Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression were performed to evaluate factors associated with progression-free survival (PFS). Furthermore, the patients were stratified according to both KELIM and BRCA status to assess the risk of platinum-resistant recurrence in each subgroup.
    Results The R0 resection rate was higher in the KELIM ≥ 1 group than in the KELIM < 1 group (77.1% vs 55.2%), and the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.024). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that KELIM was an independent predictor of R0 resection (odds ratio OR = 2.922, 95% CI: 1.112–7.678). Survival analysis demonstrated longer PFS in the KELIM ≥1 group compared with that in the KELIM <1 group (33.0 months vs 18.0 months), and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that KELIM ≥ 1 was associated with a reduced risk of disease progression (hazard ratio HR = 0.481, 95% CI: 0.280-0.826). Combined stratification analysis revealed that no platinum-resistant recurrence was observed in the subgroup with both KELIM ≥1 and a BRCA-positive status (0/21). Compared with patients with KELIM <1 and a BRCA-negative status, this subgroup exhibited a lower risk of platinum-resistant recurrence (OR = 0.053, 95% CI: 0.003-0.932, P = 0.006).
    Conclusion KELIM is an effective dynamic biomarker for predicting surgical outcomes and PFS in patients undergoing NACT-IDS. Combined stratification by KELIM and BRCA status allows more precise identification of the patient population with both KELIM ≥1 and BRCA-positive status, who have an extremely low risk of platinum-resistant recurrence, thereby providing an important basis for individualized treatment and risk stratification management in patients with advanced HGSOC.

     

/

返回文章
返回