欢迎来到《四川大学学报(医学版)》

血流限制训练对老年肌少症患者肌力及躯体功能的影响

Effects of Blood Flow Restriction Training on Muscle Strength and Physical Function in Older Adults With Sarcopenia

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨血流限制训练对住院老年肌少症患者肌肉力量、躯体功能、功能性移动能力及日常生活活动能力的影响,并比较其与传统抗阻训练的差异,为临床制定康复策略提供科学依据。
    方法 本研究采用随机对照试验设计,共纳入40例经临床诊断为肌少症的住院老年患者,按1∶1比例通过计算机生成随机分配序列分为试验组和对照组,各20例。试验组进行血流限制训练,对照组进行抗阻训练,干预持续12 周,每周3 次。分别于干预前、第4周及第12周对受试者进行评估。主要结局指标为肌肉力量,用优势手握力评估。次要结局指标包括躯体功能、功能性移动能力和日常生活活动能力,分别用简易体能状况量表(short physical performance battery, SPPB)、6 m步速和计时起立-行走测试(timed up and go test, TUG)以及改良的Barthel指数(modified barthel index, MBI)进行测量。
    结果 研究期间无失访,无不良事件发生。干预4周后,两组主要结局指标握力均较基线提升(均P<0.001),试验组握力〔(24.35±5.43) kg〕高于对照组〔(20.96±5.25) kg〕,但两组间差异无统计学意义(P=0.051);在次要结局指标方面,试验组在SPPB评分和MBI评分方面均明显优于对照组(均P<0.05),TUG测试和6 m步速差异尤为明显(P<0.01)。干预12周后,主要结局指标握力在组间差异上具有统计学意义〔试验组(25.25±5.34) kg,对照组(21.66±5.26) kg,P=0.039〕。在次要结局指标方面,试验组在SPPB评分、6 m步速、TUG测试时间和MBI评分方面均明显优于对照组(均P<0.01)。
    结论 血流限制训练能够明显改善住院老年肌少症患者的肌力、提高老年人躯体功能、功能性移动能力及日常生活活动能力,其效果优于抗阻训练。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To investigate the effects of blood flow restriction (BFR) training on muscle strength, physical function, functional mobility, and activities of daily living (ADL) in hospitalized older adults with sarcopenia, and to compare its efficacy with that of traditional resistance training (RT), thereby providing a research basis for the development of clinical rehabilitation strategies.
    Methods In this randomized controlled trial, 40 hospitalized older adults clinically diagnosed with sarcopenia were enrolled. By using a computer-generated randomization sequence, the participants were randomly assigned at a 1∶1 ratio to an experimental group (n = 20) receiving BFR training or a control group (n = 20) receiving RT. Both groups underwent a 12-week supervised program, with training sessions conducted 3 times per week. Outcome measures were assessed at baseline, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks. The primary outcome measure was muscle strength, assessed by dominant-hand grip strength. Secondary outcomes included physical function assessed with the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), functional mobility assessed by the 6-meter (6-m) gait speed and the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, and ADL assessed with the Modified Barthel Index (MBI).
    Results No participants were lost to follow-up, and no adverse events were reported. After 4 weeks of intervention, grip strength improved significantly in both groups compared with the baseline data (all P < 0.001), with the BFR group demonstrating higher grip strength than the RT group (24.35 ± 5.43 kg vs 20.96 ± 5.25 kg), although the between-group difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.051). Regarding secondary outcomes, the BFR group showed significant improvements in SPPB and MBI scores compared with the RT group (all P < 0.05), with the most pronounced differences in TUG performance and 6-m gait speed (P < 0.01). After 12 weeks of intervention, grip strength was significantly higher in the BFR group than that in the RT group (25.25 ± 5.34 kg vs. 21.66 ± 5.19 kg; P = 0.039). Moreover, the BFR group demonstrated significantly better outcomes in SPPB score, 6-m gait speed, TUG time, and MBI score than the RT group did (all P < 0.01).
    Conclusion BFR training significantly improves muscle strength, physical function, functional mobility, and ADL in hospitalized older adults with sarcopenia, showing superior efficacy compared with conventional RT.

     

/

返回文章
返回