欢迎来到《四川大学学报(医学版)》

CT血管造影多参数预测冠心病不良心脏事件的价值

Value of Multivariate Computed Tomography Angiography for Predicting Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Patients With Coronary Artery Heart Disease

  • 摘要:
    目的 探究基于CT血管造影(computed tomography angiography, CTA)的血流储备分数(fractional flow reserve, FFR)、脂肪衰减指数(fat attenuation index, FAI)及斑块特征对冠心病(coronary artery heart disease, CAD)患者主要不良心脏事件(major adverse cardiac events, MACE)发生的预测价值。
    方法 回顾性分析我院205例CAD患者资料,所有患者均进行CTA检查,测量其FFR、FAI及斑块特征,随访患者36个月内MACE的发生情况,将患者分为MACE组(n=42)和非MACE组(n=163),比较两组临床资料、FFR、FAI及斑块特征,采用logistic回归分析影响CAD患者并发MACE的相关因素;比较不同冠状动脉狭窄程度患者FFR、FAI及斑块负荷(plaque burden, PB),采用Spearman相关分析FFR、FAI及PB与CAD患者冠状动脉狭窄程度的相关性;采用受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic, ROC)曲线分析FFR、FAI及PB对CAD患者MACE的预测价值。
    结果 MACE组体质量指数、两支及以上血管病变占比、重度狭窄占比、FAI、脂质斑块体积、非钙化斑块体积及PB均高于非MACE组(P<0.05),FFR低于非MACE组(P<0.05)。共线性诊断将方差膨胀因子<3的变量纳入多因素logistic回归分析,结果显示,多支病变〔比值比(odds ratio, OR)=2.188,95%置信区间(confidence interval, CI):1.304~3.671)〕、冠状动脉重度狭窄(OR=2.918,95%CI:1.608~5.295)、FAI升高(OR=2.635,95%CI:1.510~4.598)、PB升高(OR=2.396,95%CI:1.382~4.157)是影响CAD患者发生MACE的危险因素(均P<0.05),FFR升高(OR=0.373,95%CI:0.221~0.630)为保护因素(P<0.05)。按冠状动脉狭窄程度分组,轻度组FFR高于中度组和重度组(P<0.05),FAI、PB低于中度组和重度组(P<0.05),中度组FFR高于重度组(P<0.05),FAI、PB低于重度组(P<0.05);Spearman相关分析显示,冠状动脉狭窄程度与FAI(r=0.687,95%CI:0.598~0.760)及PB值(r=0.664,95%CI:0.571~0.741)呈正相关(P<0.05),与FFR(r=-0.712,95%CI:-0.782~-0.628)呈负相关(P<0.05)。ROC曲线分析显示,FFR、FAI及PB单独及联合检测预测CAD患者发生MACE的曲线下面积分别为0.831(95%CI:0.750~0.876)、0.790(95%CI:0.719~0.861)、0.724(95%CI:0.646~0.802)、0.927(95%CI:0.890~0.964),联合预测价值更高。
    结论 基于CTA的FFR、FAI及PB与CAD患者冠状动脉狭窄程度具有相关性,且联合检测对患者并发MACE具有较高的预测价值。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To investigate the predictive value of computed tomography angiography (CTA)-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR), fat attenuation index (FAI), and plaque characteristics for the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in patients with coronary artery heart disease (CAD).
    Methods A total of 205 CAD patients were retrospectively enrolled at our hospital, and their demographic and clinical data were analyzed accordingly. All patients underwent CTA, and their FFR, FAI and plaque characteristics were measured. According to the occurrence of MACE within a 36-month follow-up period, the patients were divided into a MACE group (n = 42) and a non-MACE group (n = 163). The clinical data, FFR, FAI, and plaque characteristics were compared between the 2 groups, and logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with MACE in CAD patients. FFR, FAI, and plaque burden (PB) were further compared among patients with different degrees of coronary artery stenosis, and Spearman correlation analysis was performed to evaluate the associations of FFR, FAI, and PB with the severity of coronary artery stenosis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to assess the predictive value of FFR, FAI, and PB for MACE in CAD patients.
    Results Compared with those in the non-MACE group, the body mass index (BMI), the proportion of patients with vascular lesions involving 2 or more coronary arteries, the proportion of patients with severe coronary stenosis, FAI, lipid plaque volume, non-calcified plaque volume, and PB were significantly higher (all P < 0.05) in the MACE group, whereas FFR was significantly lower (P < 0.05) in the MACE group. Variables with variance inflation factor (VIF) < 3 on collinearity diagnostics were included in multivariate logistic regression analysis. The results showed that multivessel lesion (odds ratio OR, 2.188; 95% CI, 1.304-3.671), severe coronary artery stenosis (OR, 2.918; 95% CI, 1.608-5.295), increased FAI (OR, 2.635; 95% CI, 1.510-4.598), and increased PB (OR, 2.396; 95% CI, 1.382-4.157) were risk factors for MACE in CAD patients (P < 0.05), while increased FFR (OR, 0.373; 95% CI, 0.221-0.630) was a protective factor (P < 0.05). Stratified analysis by the severity of coronary artery stenosis showed that patients with mild stenosis had significantly higher FFR and significantly lower FAI and PB than those with moderate or severe stenosis (all P < 0.05), and that patients with moderate stenosis had significantly higher FFR and significantly lower FAI and PB than those with severe stenosis (all P < 0.05). Spearman correlation coefficient analysis revealed that the severity of coronary artery stenosis was positively correlated with FAI (r = 0.687; 95% CI, 0.598-0.760) and PB (r = 0.664; 95% CI, 0.571-0.741) (P < 0.05), but negatively correlated with FFR (r = -0.712; 95% CI, -0.782 to -0.628; P < 0.05). ROC curve analysis showed that the areas under the curve (AUCs) for predicting MACE in CAD patients using FFR, FAI, and PB individually were 0.831 (95% CI, 0.750-0.876), 0.790 (95% CI, 0.719-0.861), and 0.724 (95% CI, 0.646-0.802), respectively, whereas the combined model using the 3 parameters achieved an AUC of 0.927 (95% CI, 0.890-0.964), demonstrating superior predictive performance.
    Conclusion CTA-derived FFR, FAI, and PB are significantly correlated with the severity of coronary artery stenosis in patients with CAD. Combined assessment of these parameters demonstrates higher predictive value for the occurrence of MACE in patients with CAD.

     

/

返回文章
返回