欢迎来到《四川大学学报(医学版)》

胰管-空肠 “支架管桥接式”内引流术在机器人胰腺中段切除术中的应用价值

Application Value of Pancreatic Duct-to-Jejunum Stent-Bridging Internal Drainage in Robotic Central Pancreatectomy

  • 摘要:
    目的  初步探讨胰管-空肠 “支架管桥接式”内引流术作为胰腺中段切除术胰肠吻合的补充术式的可靠性及安全性。
    方法  收集自2021年1月−2024年11月间由我团队完成的机器人胰腺中段切除术的28例患者数据资料,并随访患者的术后内、外分泌功能。根据消化道重建方式不同,将患者分为传统胰肠吻合组及胰管-空肠 “支架管桥接式”内引流组(胰肠架桥组),主要比较两种吻合方式的手术时间、消化道重建时间以及近期并发症情况。
    结果  在接受机器人胰腺中段切除术的患者中,胰肠架桥组患者消化道重建用时(31.1±6.3) min,传统胰肠吻合组(49.7±8.9) min,前者用时更短(t=5.168,P<0.001);胰肠架桥组患者手术总时间(172.7±64.6) min,传统胰肠吻合组(200.1±52.7) min,两者差异无统计学意义(t=1.215,P=0.235);胰肠架桥组1例患者发生术后生化瘘,14例患者发生B级胰瘘,B级胰瘘中1例合并胰瘘相关腹腔感染,13例带管时间超过21d,传统胰肠吻合组2例患者发生术后生化瘘,11例患者发生B级胰瘘,B级胰瘘中1例合并胰瘘相关腹腔感染,1例合并胰瘘相关腹腔出血及腹腔感染。两组患者均未发生术后胃瘫、术后胰腺炎、C级胰瘘。在两组患者术后总体并发症发生率(P=0.522)、术后胰瘘发生率(P=0.583)、术后腹腔感染(P=0.583)及出血发生率(P=0.464)差异均无统计学意义。
    结论  胰管-空肠 “支架管桥接式”内引流术优化了胰腺中段切除术中远端胰腺与空肠的吻合步骤,缩短了消化道重建时间,降低了手术难度,同时并未增加术后近期严重并发症发生风险,该术式安全可行。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective  To conduct preliminary evaluation of the reliability and safety of pancreatic duct-to-jejunum stent-bridging internal drainage as a supplementary approach to pancreaticojejunostomy in central pancreatectomy.
    Methods  The clinical data of 28 patients who underwent robotic central pancreatectomy performed by our team between January 2021 and November 2024 were retrospectively collected, and and follow-up of postoperative endocrine and exocrine functions was performed. Based on the methods of digestive tract reconstruction adopted, the patients were divided into a conventional pancreaticojejunostomy group and a pancreatic duct-to-jejunum stent-bridging internal drainage group (PancreaticoJejunal-Stent bridge group). The operative time, digestive tract reconstruction time, and short-term complications were compared between the two groups.
    Results  Among patients undergoing robotic central pancreatectomy, the digestive tract reconstruction time was shorter (t = 5.168, P < 0.001) in the PancreaticoJejunal-Stent bridge group (31.1 ± 6.3 min) than that in the conventional pancreaticojejunostomy group (49.7 ± 8.9 min) (t = 5.168, P < 0.001). The total operative time was (172.7 ± 64.6) min in the PancreaticoJejunal-Stent bridge group and (200.1 ± 52.7) min in the conventional pancreaticojejunostomy group, showing no statistically significant difference (t = 1.215, P = 0.235). In the PancreaticoJejunal-Stent bridge group, one patient developed a postoperative biochemical fistula, and 14 patients developed grade B pancreatic fistulas. Among the 14 patients with grade B pancreatic fistulas, 1 case was complicated by fistula-related intra-abdominal infection, and 13 cases had drainage tube retention time of more than 21 days. In the conventional pancreaticojejunostomy group, 2 patients developed postoperative biochemical fistulas, and 11 patients developed grade B pancreatic fistulas. Among the 11 patients with grade B pancreatic fistulas, 1 case was complicated by fistula-related intra-abdominal infection, and 1 case was complicated by fistula-related intra-abdominal bleeding and infection. No postoperative gastroparesis, pancreatitis, or grade C pancreatic fistulas occurred in either group. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in overall postoperative complication rate (P = 0.522), postoperative pancreatic fistula rate (P = 0.583), intra-abdominal infection rate (P = 0.583), or bleeding rate (P = 0.464).
    Conclusion  Pancreatic duct-to-jejunum stent-bridging internal drainage optimizes the anastomosis between the distal end of the pancreas and the jejunum during central pancreatectomy, shortens digestive tract reconstruction time, and reduces surgical complexity without increasing the risk of short-term severe postoperative complications. This approach is safe and feasible.

     

/

返回文章
返回