欢迎来到《四川大学学报(医学版)》

大学生体质指数变化轨迹及干预策略

Trajectory of Body Mass Index and Intervention Strategies Among College Students

  • 摘要:
    目的 分析天津市某高校学生2021–2024年体质指数的变化趋势,并依据体质健康测试结果提出干预策略。
    方法 随机抽取天津某高校1000名2021级大一学生,追踪收集其大学四年的体质健康测试数据,比较不同体质指数分级学生的体质健康测试结果的差异性,并使用线性回归方法探究影响大学生体质指数变化的关键因素。
    结果 体重过低学生占比基本稳定,从大一时的2.5%略微下降到大四时的2.0%,正常体重学生占比呈波动下降趋势,从入学时71.5%下降至到大四时69.0%,而超重/肥胖体重学生占比呈波动上升趋势。在各项体质健康测试项目中,大一时,超重或肥胖体重组学生的立定跳远项目〔(2.15±0.42) m,P=0.08)〕表现最好,正常体重组学生的坐位体前屈项目〔(20.1±7.5) cm,P=0.03)〕表现最好,体重过低组学生的仰卧起坐项目〔1 min (48.7±19.5)次,P=0.02)〕表现最好。通过简单线性回归分析发现,大四时,体重过低变正常体重学生与仰卧起坐〔β=0.03,95%置信区间(confidence interval, CI):0.018~0.041〕和1000 m跑(β=0.73,95%CI:0.601~0.877)成绩相关,正常体重变超重/肥胖体重学生与800 m跑(β=-0.08,95%CI:-0.102~-0.047)和1000 m跑(β=-16.9,95%CI:-19.110~-13.826)成绩相关,超重/肥胖体重变正常体重与立定跳远(β=-0.41,95%CI:-0.631~-0.227)和1000 m跑(β=-0.15,95%CI:-0.215~-0.073)成绩相关。
    结论 不同体质指数分级的男生都应加强1000 m跑锻炼,超重/肥胖体重男生应同时加强立定跳远锻炼;体重过低女生应加强仰卧起坐锻炼,正常体重女生应加强800 m跑锻炼,超重/肥胖女生应加强立定跳远锻炼。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To analyze the trend of changes in the ranges of body mass index (BMI) among students at a university in Tianjin from 2021 to 2024, and to propose intervention strategies based on the key influencing factors.
    Methods A total of 1000 first-year students enrolled in 2021 at a university in Tianjin were randomly selected, and their physical fitness test data over the 4 years of undergraduate study were collected. Differences in physical fitness test results were compared among students with varying BMI ranges. Linear regression analysis was used to identify the key factors affecting changes in BMI ranges in the students.
    Results The proportion of underweight students remained relatively stable, decreasing slightly from 2.5% in the first year to 2.0% in the senior year. The proportion of students with normal weight showed a fluctuating downward trend, from 71.5% at college enrollment to 69.0% by the fourth year. In contrast, the proportion of overweight/obese students showed a fluctuating upward trend. In physical fitness tests for the first year, overweight/obese students showed the best performance in the standing long jump test (2.15 ± 0.42 m, P = 0.08), normal-weight students showed the best performance in the sit-and-reach test (20.1 ± 7.5 cm, P = 0.03), and underweight students performed best in the sit-up test (1 min 48.7 ± 19.5 repeats, P = 0.02). Simple linear regression analysis revealed that students who changed from being underweight to having normal weight by the senior year showed associations with sit-up performance (β = 0.03, 95% CI, 0.018 to 0.041) and 1000 m run (β = 0.73, 95% CI, 0.601 to 0.877). Students who transitioned from having normal weight to being overweight/obese were showed negative associations with their performance in 800 m run (β = -0.08, 95% CI, -0.102 to -0.047) and 1000 m run (β = -16.9, 95% CI, -19.110 to -13.826). Students who changed from being overweight/obese to having normal weight showed associations with their performance in standing long jump (β = -0.41, 95% CI, -0.631 to -0.227) and 1000 m run (β = -0.15, 95% CI, -0.215 to -0.073).
    Conclusion Male students of different BMI ranges should focus on improving their 1000 m run performance, and overweight/obese male students should emphasize standing long jump training as well. Underweight female students should strengthen sit-up training, normal-weight female students should focus on 800 m run training, and overweight/obese females students should strengthen standing long jump training.

     

/

返回文章
返回