欢迎来到《四川大学学报(医学版)》

不同秀丽隐杆线虫U6启动子对CRISPR/Cas9介导的基因编辑效率的影响

Effect of Different Caenorhabditis elegans U6 Promoters on the Efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Gene Editing

  • 摘要:
    目的 本研究拟以秀丽隐杆线虫(Caenorhabditis elegans, C. elegans)为模型,探究其内源性U6启动子对dpy-10基因编辑效率的影响。
    方法 利用WormBase数据库筛选C. elegans内源性U6 snRNA基因;通过分子克隆技术,以pSX524质粒(Peft-3::Cas9::tbb-2 terminator::U6 r07e5.16::dpy-10 sgRNA)为模板,替代其U6r07e5.16启动子,以构建其他14种靶向dpy-10基因的打靶载体;采用标准化微注射流程,对野生型C. elegans进行基因编辑,基于其子1代线虫dpy-10 基因突变表型的筛选,计算基因编辑效率和高效基因编辑指数这两个观测指标。
    结果 从WormBase数据库获得15个U6 snRNA基因(r07e5.16f35c11.9t20d3.13k09b11.15k09b11.16w05b2.8c28a5.7f54c8.9k09b11.11k09b11.12k09b11.14t20d3.12f54c8.8f54c8.10k09b11.13)。基于基因编辑效率和高效基因编辑指数对这些基因启动子活性进行评估后,发现4个U6基因(w05b2.8c28a5.7f54c8.9k09b11.11)启动子能显著提高基因编辑的成功率,其表现优于其他启动子,包括C. elegans研究中广泛使用的U6r07e5.16和U6k09b11.12启动子。此外,在使用高效U6w05b2.8启动子的情况下,gRNAF+E支架相较于gRNA支架并未表现出更高的编辑效率。
    结论 本研究鉴定了能显著提高C. elegans基因编辑效率的U6启动子,揭示了U6启动子优化选择在基因编辑系统中的关键作用,为改进基因组编辑策略提供了重要依据,并为优化线虫研究中的CRISPR技术提供了新思路。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To investigate the effects of Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) endogenous U6 promoters on dpy-10 gene editing efficiency.
    Methods We screened endogenous U6 small nuclear RNA (snRNA) genes of C. elegans from the WormBase database and constructed 14 editing plasmids targeting dpy-10 by replacing the U6r07e5.16 promoter in the pSX524 plasmid (Peft-3::cas9::tbb-2 terminator::U6 r07e5.16::dpy-10 sgRNA) through molecular cloning. Gene editing was performed in wild-type C. elegans using a standardized microinjection protocol. Gene editing efficiency and the high-efficiency gene editing index were quantified based on the screening of dpy-10 mutant phenotypes in the F1 progeny.
    Results A total of 15 U6 snRNA genes (r07e5.16, f35c11.9, t20d3.13, k09b11.15, k09b11.16, w05b2.8, c28a5.7, f54c8.9, k09b11.11, k09b11.12, k09b11.14, t20d3.12, f54c8.8, f54c8.10, and k09b11.13) were identified from the WormBase database. Based on the editing efficiency and high-efficiency gene editing index, the activity of these promoters was evaluated, and 4 U6 promoters (w05b2.8, c28a5.7, f54c8.9, and k09b11.11) were found to have significantly enhanced gene editing success rates, outperforming other promoters, including U6r07e5.16 and U6k09b11.12, which are commonly used in the C. elegans research community. Notably, the gRNAF+E scaffold did not show superior editing efficiency over the gRNA scaffold when paired with the optimal U6w05b2.8 promoter.
    Conclusion In this study, U6 promoters that significantly improve gene editing efficiency in C. elegans are identified and the critical role of promoter optimization in CRISPR-Cas9 systems is highlighted. These findings provide a valuable foundation for improving genome editing strategies and offer new ideas for optimizing the CRISPR technology applied in nematode research.

     

/

返回文章
返回