欢迎来到《四川大学学报(医学版)》

TruScreen联合高危HPV检测与液基细胞学联合HPV检测在宫颈癌筛查中的对比研究

TruScreen Combined With High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Testing vs Thinprep Cytology Test Combined With High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening: A Comparative Clinical Study

  • 摘要:
    目的  对比人工智能宫颈癌实时筛查技术(TruScreen)联合高危人乳头瘤病毒(high-risk human papillomavirus, hr-HPV)检测与液基薄层细胞学检测(Thinprep cytologic test, TCT)联合hr-HPV在宫颈癌筛查中的临床价值。
    方法  研究对象为2020年6月–2023年12月期间在攀枝花市中心医院接受宫颈癌筛查的297例女性,筛查项目包括HPV检测、TCT检测以及TruScreen检测。以病理结果为标准,评估TruScreen联合hr-HPV与TCT联合hr-HPV对宫颈低度鳞状上皮内病变(low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion positive, LSIL+)及高度鳞状上皮内病变(high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion positive, HSIL+)的诊断效果。
    结果  在297例受试者中,病理确诊LSIL+ 128例(43.10%),HSIL+ 67例(22.56%)。HPV16/18阳性110例(37.04%),TCT检测≥未明确诊断意义的非典型鳞状细胞(atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance, ASC-US)177例(59.60%),176例(59.26%)TruScreen检测异常;TruScreen联合hr-HPV诊断LSIL+及HSIL+宫颈病变的曲线下面积(area under the curve, AUC)高于TCT联合hr-HPV(P<0.05)。
    结论  TruScreen联合hr-HPV在宫颈癌筛查中的效果优于TCT联合hr-HPV,可作为传统细胞学检查的潜在替代方案,具有较高的临床应用价值。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To compare the clinical value of TruScreen, an artificial intelligence-based real-time cervical cancer screening system, combined with high-risk human papillomavirus (hr-HPV) test and Thinprep cytology test (TCT) combined with hr-HPV test in cervical cancer screening.
    Methods A total of 297 women undergoing cervical cancer screening at Panzhihua Central Hospital between June 2020 and December 2023 were enrolled. All participants underwent hr-HPV testing, TCT, and TruScreen test. The diagnostic performance of TruScreen combined with hr-HPV test and TCT combined with hr-HPV test for low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion positive (LSIL+) and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion positive (HSIL+) cervical lesions was evaluated.
    Results Among the 297 enrolled women, pathology analysis identified 128 (43.10%) LSI+ cases and 67 (22.56%) HSIL+ cases. Additionally, there were 110 (37.04%) HPV16/18 positive cases, 177 (59.60%) cases with TCT results ≥ atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS), and 176 (59.26%) cases with abnormal TruScreen results. The area under the curve (AUC) of TruScreen combined with hr-HPV test in diagnosing LSIL+ and HSIL+ cervical lesions was higher than that of TCT combined with hr-HPV test (P < 0.05).
    Conclusion TruScreen combined with hr-HPV test demonstrates superior performance in cervical cancer screening compared with TCT combined with hr-HPV test. TruScreen combined with hr-HPV test may serve as an alternative to conventional cytology-based methods for cervical cancer screening in China.

     

/

返回文章
返回