欢迎来到《四川大学学报(医学版)》

司维拉姆与醋酸钙治疗维持性血液透析患者高磷血症的效果对比

Sevelamer vs. Calcium Acetate for Treating Hyperphosphatemia in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients

  • 摘要:
    目的  探究司维拉姆(sevelamer, SL)与醋酸钙(calcium acetate, CA)治疗终末期肾病(end-stage renal disease, ESRD)维持性血液透析(maintenance hemodialysis, MHD)患者高磷血症的治疗效果及对钙磷代谢、外周血胎球蛋白A(fetuin A)、成纤维细胞生长因子-23(fibroblast growth factor-23, FGF-23)水平的影响。
    方法 选取2022年1月–2023年12月于淄博市第一医院收治的92例ESRD患者,依据随机数字表法分为CA组和SL组,每组各46例,两组均实施维持性血液透析治疗及常规治疗,CA组在此基础上加以醋酸钙治疗,SL组在常规治疗基础上加以司维拉姆治疗,持续治疗3个月。比较两组患者主要结局指标:临床疗效;次要结局指标:钙磷代谢指标〔血钙、血磷、钙磷乘积、甲状旁腺激素(intact parathyroid hormone,iPTH)〕及冠状动脉钙化积分(coronary artery calcification score, CACs)水平、血清生化指标〔fetuin A、FGF-23、C-反应蛋白(C-reactive protein, CRP)〕及治疗期间不良反应情况、心血管事件发生率。
    结果 两组基线资料比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);SL组、CA组临床疗效比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组治疗前后血钙、血磷、钙磷乘积、iPTH、CACs差值比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组治疗前后fetuin A、FGF-23、CRP差值比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗期间,组间不良反应发生率、心血管事件发生率比较无差异(P>0.05)。
    结论 司维拉姆在治疗MHD患者高磷血症的疗效优于CA,可有效调节机体钙磷代谢、降低CACs、调节外周血fetuin A、FGF-23水平,不良反应少,值得临床应用。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To investigate the efficacy of sevelamer (SL) and calcium acetate (CA) in treating hyperphosphatemia in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) and their effects on calcium-phosphorus metabolism and levels of peripheral blood fetuin-A and fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23).
    Methods A total of 92 ESRD patients attending the First Hospital of Zibo between January 2022 and December 2023 were enrolled. They were randomly assigned to either the CA group (46 cases) or the SL group (46 cases) using a random number table method. Patients in both groups received MHD and conventional treatment. Additionally, patients in the CA group were given CA, while those in the SL group were given SL, with the treatment continuing for 3 months. The outcome indicators were assessed and compared between the two groups. The primary outcome indicator was clinical efficacy. The secondary outcome indicators included calcium-phosphorus metabolism indicators (blood calcium, blood phosphorus, calcium-phosphorus product, and intact parathyroid hormone iPTH), coronary artery calcification score (CACs), serum biochemical indicators (including fetuin-A, FGF-23, and C-reactive protein CRP), and adverse reactions and cardiovascular events during the course of treatment.
    Results There were no statistically significant differences in baseline data between the two groups (P > 0.05). There was a significant difference in clinical efficacy between the SL group and the CA group (P < 0.05). The differences in blood calcium, blood phosphorus, calcium-phosphorus product, iPTH, and CACs before and after treatment were statistically significant between the two groups (P < 0.05). The differences in fetuin-A, FGF-23, and CRP before and after treatment were also statistically significant between the two groups (P < 0.05). During treatment, there was no significant difference in the incidences of adverse reactions and cardiovascular events between the two groups (P > 0.05).
    Conclusion SL demonstrates superior efficacy compared to CA in treating hyperphosphatemia in MHD patients. SL effectively regulates calcium-phosphorus metabolism, reduces CACs, regulates peripheral blood fetuin-A and FGF-23 levels, and leads to fewer adverse reactions. SL may be a preferred option for clinical management.

     

/

返回文章
返回