欢迎来到《四川大学学报(医学版)》
吴祥瑞, 杨先梅, 范箬馨, 等. 社区精神分裂症谱系障碍患者暴力再犯动态预测:一种联合模型[J]. 四川大学学报(医学版), 2024, 55(4): 918-924. DOI: 10.12182/20240760504
引用本文: 吴祥瑞, 杨先梅, 范箬馨, 等. 社区精神分裂症谱系障碍患者暴力再犯动态预测:一种联合模型[J]. 四川大学学报(医学版), 2024, 55(4): 918-924. DOI: 10.12182/20240760504
WU Xiangrui, YANG Xianmei, FAN Ruoxin, et al. Dynamic Prediction of Recidivism in Violence in Community-Based Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder Patients: A Joint Model[J]. Journal of Sichuan University (Medical Sciences), 2024, 55(4): 918-924. DOI: 10.12182/20240760504
Citation: WU Xiangrui, YANG Xianmei, FAN Ruoxin, et al. Dynamic Prediction of Recidivism in Violence in Community-Based Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder Patients: A Joint Model[J]. Journal of Sichuan University (Medical Sciences), 2024, 55(4): 918-924. DOI: 10.12182/20240760504

社区精神分裂症谱系障碍患者暴力再犯动态预测:一种联合模型

Dynamic Prediction of Recidivism in Violence in Community-Based Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder Patients: A Joint Model

  • 摘要:
    目的 采用联合建模的策略,建立一种能预测社区精神分裂症谱系障碍患者(简称精分患者)暴力再犯的模型。
    方法 基于中国西南某地2017年1月–2018年6月重性精神疾病基本数据,选取基线存在暴力行为的4565名社区成年精分患者作为研究对象。采用生长混合模型识别服药依从性和社会功能模式,进一步采用零膨胀负二项回归模型拟合联合模型,并与传统静态模型进行比较,最后采用10折训练-测试分割交叉验证框架评价模型拟合和预测效果。
    结果 157位(3.44%)患者发生暴力再犯。服药依从性和社会功能均拟合出4种模式。计数模型中,年龄、婚姻情况、教育水平、经济水平、历史暴力类型和服药依从性模式是暴力再犯发生次数的预测因素(P<0.05)。零膨胀模型中,年龄、药物不良反应、历史暴力类型、服药依从性模式和社会功能模式是暴力再犯是否发生的预测因素(P<0.05)。联合模型训练集赤池信息准则(Akaike information criterion, AIC)平均值为776.5±9.4、测试集均方根误差(root mean squared error, RMSE)平均值为0.168±0.013、平均绝对误差(mean absolute error, MAE)平均值为0.131±0.018,均小于传统静态模型。
    结论 联合建模是一种有效的动态变量识别与处理统计学策略,预测性能优于传统静态模型,可为推动综合干预体系建设提供全新思路。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective  To construct a model for predicting recidivism in violence in community-based schizophrenia spectrum disorder patients (SSDP) by adopting a joint modeling method.
    Methods  Based on the basic data on severe mental illness in Southwest China between January 2017 and June 2018, 4565 community-based SSDP with baseline violent behaviors were selected as the research subjects. We used a growth mixture model (GMM) to identify patterns of medication adherence and social functioning. We then fitted the joint model using a zero-inflated negative binomial regression model and compared it with traditional static models. Finally, we used a 10-fold training-test cross validation framework to evaluate the models’ fitting and predictive performance.
    Results  A total of 157 patients (3.44%) experienced recidivism in violence. Medication compliance and social functioning were fitted into four patterns. In the counting model, age, marital status, educational attainment, economic status, historical types of violence, and medication compliance patterns were predictive factors for the frequency of recidivism of violence (P<0.05). In the zero-inflated model, age, adverse drug reactions, historical types of violence, medication compliance patterns, and social functioning patterns were predictive factors for the recidivism in violence (P<0.05). For the joint model, the average value of Akaike information criterion (AIC) for the train set was 776.5±9.4, the average value of root mean squared error (RMSE) for the testing set was 0.168±0.013, and the average value of mean absolute error (MAE) for the testing set was 0.131±0.018, which were all lower than those of the traditional static models.
    Conclusion  Joint modeling is an effective statistical strategy for identifying and processing dynamic variables, exhibiting better predictive performance than that of the traditional static models. It can provide new ideas for promoting the construction of comprehensive intervention systems.

     

/

返回文章
返回