Objective  To investigate the role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the treatment of diabetic ulcers.

  Methods  The clinical data of 27 diabetic patients, who underwent CEUS examination of their ulcers in our hospital between April 2021 and July 2022 were collected. Among them, 26 patients suffered from diabetic foot ulcers, 5 of whom underwent amputation during hospitalization, and one patient suffered from hip ulcer. The 27 patients’ mean age was (64.08±12.57) years. Fasting blood glucose levels of the patients were 3.36-34.61 mmol/L, with a mean of (10.62±8.77) mmol/L. Their glycosylated hemoglobin levels were 5.80%-10.70%, with an average of 7.96%±1.50%. Philips EPIQ7 ultrasound system with L9-3 linear probe of 3-9 MHz was used. First, the patients' ulcers were examined with conventional ultrasound to observe for abnormal echo. Then, 2.4 mL SonoVue (Bracco, Italy), a contrast agent, was injected intravenously through the elbow to look for effusion/pus, sinus tract, or dead space in the lesion area, and images were acquired.

  Results  Among the 27 patients, except for 5 with amputation stumps, 22 patients had wound areas ranging from 0.16 cm² to 215 cm², all being accompanied by sinus tract formation. Ten patients underwent ultrasound examination during their treatment. The positive rate of the results of conventional ultrasound was 50% (5/10) for identifying effusion/pus and pseudoaneurysm in the deep area of ulcers, while the positive rate of CEUS results was 100% (10/10). In addition to the lesions found by conventional ultrasound, CEUS also found large sinus tracts or dead spaces in the deep surface of ulcers in 5 additional patients. Of the 27 patients, 17 underwent ultrasound examination of the healing status of sinus tracts and dead spaces in the deep areas of ulcers before discharge. No sinus tracts in the deep areas of the ulcers were found by conventional ultrasound. However, relatively small dead spaces or sinus tracts in the deep areas of the ulcers were found in 10 patients by CEUS. Conventional ultrasound and CEUS found that 1 patient had a small amount of fluid in the amputation stump. In the remaining 6 patients, no deep sinus tracts in the ulcers were found by either conventional ultrasound or CUES, and the ulcers healed completely.

  Conclusion  By examining microvascular perfusion in diabetic wounds with CEUS, we can observe the extent of sinus tracts during treatment and whether the sinus tracts have healed or whether there are still dead spaces before patient discharge, which provides support for clinical decision-making concerning the treatment of diabetic ulcers.