欢迎来到《四川大学学报(医学版)》

有创机械通气的急性呼吸衰竭儿童早期拔管改无创呼吸支持序贯的临床研究

Clinical Study on Early Extubation and Sequential Non-Invasive Respiratory Support for Children with Acute Respiratory Failure Receiving Invasive Mechanical Ventilation

  • 摘要:
      目的  探究早期拔管改无创机械通气策略对儿童急性呼吸衰竭的治疗效果,及其替代传统方式的安全性和可行性。
      方法  将2019年1月–2010年12月四川大学华西第二医院儿童重症医学科收治的1月~14岁急性呼吸衰竭患儿102例,随机分为治疗1组(n=55)、治疗2组(n=47);并将研究开始前一年内相同病情患儿53例设为对照组。两个治疗组均先拔管再撤机:治疗1组达到有创-无创切换标准时拔出气管导管使用无创BiPAP进行呼吸支持,治疗2组拔管后使用经鼻高流量湿化氧疗(high-flow nasal cannula, HFNC)进行呼吸支持;对照组(拔管、撤机同时进行)采用渐进式撤机方法。主要比较气管插管期间呼吸机相关性肺炎的发生率,从入组开始评估两组的死亡率;比较治疗组拔管时及对照组拔管撤机时压力支持水平PC above PEEP、气管插管时间、序贯时间(仅2个治疗组间)、撤机失败率,喉头水肿及鼻部压疮发生率。
      结果  本研究以婴儿(93例,60%)、幼儿(31例,20%)为主,155例患儿中,男性占82例(53%);各组患儿年龄分布及性别差异无统计学意义。3组患儿气管插管前各临床指标差异无统计学意义。两治疗组拔管时PC above PEEP高于对照组,且治疗1组高于治疗2组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两治疗组的气管插管时间较对照组短,且治疗1组短于治疗2组(P<0.05);治疗2组序贯时间短于治疗1组(P<0.05)。两治疗组拔管失败率以及呼吸机相关性肺炎的发生率低于对照组,两治疗组之间差异无统计学意义;治疗1组鼻部压疮发生率较其他两组高(P<0.05)。治疗组1死亡1例,治疗组2和对照组均无死亡病例,3组间拔管后喉头水肿发生率及死亡率差异无统计学意义。
      结论  早期拔管改无创机械通气,患儿耐受良好,可作为急性呼吸衰竭患儿的一种有效撤机方式在临床推广使用。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To explore the treatment outcome of the strategy of early extubation and then switching to non-invasive mechanical ventilation in children with acute respiratory failure, and the safety and feasibility of using the strategy to replace traditional methods.
      Methods  A total of 102 children, aged between 1 month to 14 years old, who had acute respiratory failure and were admitted to the pediatric ICU of West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University between January 2019 and December 2020 were enrolled and randomly assigned to treatment group 1 (n=55) and treatment group 2 (n=47). In addition, 53 children who had the same condition in the 12 month prior to the beginning of the study were included in the control group. In the two treatment groups, the patients were extubated first, and then weaned off the ventilator. In group 1, when the patient met the invasive-non-invasive switching criteria, the tracheal tube was pulled out and non-invasive bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP) ventilation was used for respiratory support. In group 2, high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy was used for respiratory support. The traditional progressive weaning method was adopted for the control group (extubing and weaning were performed at the same time). The incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) during the period of tracheal intubation was compared and the mortality of the two groups was evaluated from the point when the patients were recruited. At the time of extubation in the treatment groups and extubation plus weaning in the control group, the pressure support levels, or PC above PEEP, intubation time, sequential time (between 2 treatment groups only), weaning failure rate, and the incidence of laryngeal edema and nasal pressure ulcer were compared.
      Results  The subjects of the study were predominantly infants (93 cases, 60%) and young children (31 cases, 20%). Among the 155 cases, 82 (53%) were male. There was no statistical difference in age distribution or gender among the groups. There was no significant difference in the clinical indicators among the three groups before tracheal intubation. At the time of extubation, the PC above PEEP in the two treatment groups was higher than that in the control group, and higher in group 1 than that of group 2, the difference being statistically significant (P<0.05). The intubation time of the two treatment groups was shorter than that of the control group, and shorter in group 1 than that of group 2 (P<0.05). The sequential time of group 2 was shorter than that of group 1 (P<0.05). The extubation failure rate and the incidence of VAP in the two treatment groups were lower than those in the control group, and there was no statistically significant difference between the two treatment groups. The incidence of nasal pressure ulcers in group 1 was higher than that in the other two groups (P<0.05). There was 1 death in treatment group 1, and no deaths in treatment group 2 or the control group. There was no significant difference in mortality or the incidence of laryngeal edema after extubation in the three groups.
      Conclusion  Early extubation and then switching to non-invasive mechanical ventilation can be well tolerated by the patients, and can be used in clinical practice as an effective weaning method for children with acute respiratory failure.

     

/

返回文章
返回