欢迎来到《四川大学学报(医学版)》

异常凝血酶原对乙型肝炎病毒相关性AFP阴性肝癌的诊断价值研究

卫荣荣 王成成 李大江 胡秀英 刘凯

卫荣荣, 王成成, 李大江, 等. 异常凝血酶原对乙型肝炎病毒相关性AFP阴性肝癌的诊断价值研究[J]. 四川大学学报(医学版), 2020, 51(3): 411-415. doi: 10.12182/20200560208
引用本文: 卫荣荣, 王成成, 李大江, 等. 异常凝血酶原对乙型肝炎病毒相关性AFP阴性肝癌的诊断价值研究[J]. 四川大学学报(医学版), 2020, 51(3): 411-415. doi: 10.12182/20200560208
WEI Rong-rong, WANG Cheng-cheng, LI Da-jiang, et al. Diagnostic Value of Abnormal Prothrombin in HBV-related AFP-negative Hepatocellular Carcinoma[J]. JOURNAL OF SICHUAN UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCIENCE EDITION), 2020, 51(3): 411-415. doi: 10.12182/20200560208
Citation: WEI Rong-rong, WANG Cheng-cheng, LI Da-jiang, et al. Diagnostic Value of Abnormal Prothrombin in HBV-related AFP-negative Hepatocellular Carcinoma[J]. JOURNAL OF SICHUAN UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCIENCE EDITION), 2020, 51(3): 411-415. doi: 10.12182/20200560208

栏目: 临床医学

异常凝血酶原对乙型肝炎病毒相关性AFP阴性肝癌的诊断价值研究

doi: 10.12182/20200560208
基金项目: 四川大学华西医院学科卓越发展1.3.5工程项目(No. ZY2016204)资助
详细信息
    通讯作者:

    E-mail:liubusiness@163.com

Diagnostic Value of Abnormal Prothrombin in HBV-related AFP-negative Hepatocellular Carcinoma

More Information
  • 摘要:   目的  评估血清异常凝血酶原(DCP)对甲胎蛋白(AFP)阴性(AFP≤20 ng/mL)肝癌诊断价值及其水平与Child-Pugh分级、肿瘤大小、TNM分期、肿瘤分化程度的关系。  方法  回顾性纳入2016年6月−2017年12月在四川大学华西医院确诊为乙肝相关性肝病的住院患者459例,其中肝癌组136例,非肝癌组323例(肝硬化组173例,肝炎组150例)。所有患者血清AFP均≤20 ng/mL。用受试者工作特性 (ROC) 曲线分析血清DCP对AFP阴性肝癌的诊断效能,并分析血清DCP水平与肝癌临床特征间的关系。  结果  与非肝癌组相比,肝癌组男性的比例更高,年龄更大,血清DCP水平更高(中位数,22 mAU/mL vs.159 mAU/mL),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.001)。肝癌组与肝硬化组、肝炎组比较,三组患者在性别比、年龄、AFP、DCP水平等方面的差异均有统计学意义(P<0.001)。肝癌组的DCP水平高于肝硬化组(中位数,19 mAU/mL)和肝炎组(中位数,26 mAU/mL)(P<0.001)。在所有AFP阴性的患者中,以DCP诊断肝癌,其曲线下面积(AUC)为0.858,P<0.05。其诊断的最佳切点值为61 mAU/mL,对应的灵敏度为72.8%,特异度为88.2%,阳性预测值为61.1%,阴性预测值为89.7%。在不同大小肿瘤中,直径>3 cm者DCP水平高于直径≤3 cm者(P<0.05)。在不同TNM分期中,Ⅱ、Ⅲ期DCP水平高于Ⅰ期(P<0.05)。在不同Child-Pugh分级、不同分化程度的肝癌间DCP水平差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。  结论  DCP对于AFP阴性肝癌有一定诊断价值,其水平升高可能与肝癌的进展相关。
  • 图  1  肝癌组和非肝癌组患者血清DCP水平的比较

    Figure  1.  Comparision of DCP level in groups of HCC and non-HCC

    图  2  肝癌组、肝硬化组、肝炎组患者血清DCP水平的比较

    Figure  2.  Comparision of DCP level in groups of HCC, LC and CHB

    图  3  血清DCP水平在AFP阴性的患者中诊断肝癌的ROC曲线

    Figure  3.  Diagnosis of HCC in AFP-negative HCC patients by ROC curve of DCP

    Arrow indicates the optimal cut-off value

    图  4  肝癌患者不同Child-Pugh分级的DCP水平分布

    Figure  4.  DCP level in HCC stratified by Child-Pugh grade

    图  5  肝癌患者不同TNM分期的DCP水平分布

    Figure  5.  DCP level in HCC stratified by TNM stage

    * P<0.05, vs. Ⅰ

    图  6  肝癌患者不同分化程度的DCP水平分布

    Figure  6.  DCP level in HCC stratified by differentiation

    图  7  不同肝癌病灶直径中DCP水平分布

    Figure  7.  DCP level in HCC stratified by tumor diameter

    * P<0.05,vs. >3 cm

    表  1  研究患者的基线特征和观察指标

    Table  1.   Baseline characteristics of the study population

    CharacteristicHCC group (n=136)Non-HCC groupP
    Total (n=223)LC (n=173)CHB (n=150)P1P2
    Male/female (case)125︰11150︰73#130︰43#120︰30#<0.001<0.001
    Age*/yr.53 (46-62), 25-8644 (36-52), 16-77#49 (42-55), 23-77#37 (30-46), 18-77#<0.001<0.001
    AFP*/(ng/mL)5 (3-10), 0.63-19.545 (3-18), 1-1 2104 (3-8), 0.61-19.4518 (4-138), 1.15-1 2100.084<0.001
    DCP*/(mAU/mL)159 (47-1 059), 11-75 00022 (16-34), 3-20 298#19 (13-27), 3-1 837#26 (19-38), 10-20 298#<0.001<0.001
     HCC: Hepatic cellular cancer; LC: Liver cirrhosis; CHB: Chronic hepatitis; *Median (P25-P75) , Min-Max; P1:Comparison between HCC and non-HCC groups; P2: Comparison between HCC, LC and CHB groups; #P<0.05, vs. HCC group; △P<0.05, vs. HCC and LC groups
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] ZHONG J H, KE Y, WANG Y Y, et al. Liver resection for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and macrovascular invasion, multiple tumours, or portal hypertension. Gut,2015,64(3): 520–521. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308139
    [2] KHALILI K, MENEZES R, KIM T K, et al. The effectiveness of ultrasound surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma in a Canadian centre and determinants of its success. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol,2015,29(5): 267–273. doi: 10.1155/2015/563893
    [3] WILSON S R, LYSHCHIK A, PISCAGLIA F, et al. CEUS LI-RADS: algorithm, implementation, and key differences from CT/MRI. Abdom Radiol (NY),2018,43(1): 127–142. doi: 10.1007/s00261-017-1250-0
    [4] TENFLO J, SUTTIE J W. Vitamin K-dependent formation of gamma-carboxyglutamic acid. Annu Rev Biochem,1977,46(1): 157–172. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.46.070177.001105
    [5] SEO S I, KIM H S, KIM W J, et al. Diagnostic value of PIVKA-II and alpha-fetoprotein in hepatitis B virus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol,2015,21(13): 3928–3935. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i13.3928
    [6] Clinical practice guidelines for hepatocellular carcinoma differ between Japan, United States, and Europe. Liver Cancer, 2015, 4(2): 85-95. doi: 10.1159/000367730.
    [7] LIU Z, JIANG Y, YUAN H, et al. The trends in incidence of primary liver cancer caused by specific etiologies: results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016 and implications for liver cancer prevention. J Hepatol,2019,70(4): 674–683. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.12.001
    [8] 中华医学会感染病学分会, 中华医学会肝病学分会. 慢性乙型肝炎防治指南(2019年版). 临床肝胆病杂志,2019,35(12): 2648–2669.
    [9] 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会医政医管局. 原发性肝癌诊疗规范(2019年版). 中国实用外科杂志,2020,40(2): 121–138.
    [10] SHE S, XIANG Y, YANG M, et al. C-reactive protein is a biomarker of AFP-negative HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Oncol,2015,47(2): 543–554. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2015.3042
    [11] SENGUPTA S, PARIKH N D. Biomarker development for hepatocellular carcinoma early detection: current and future perspectives. Hepat Oncol,2017,4(4): 111–122. doi: 10.2217/hep-2017-0019
    [12] SONG P P, XIA J F, INAGAKI Y, et al. Controversies regarding and perspectives on clinical utility of biomarkers in hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol,2016,22(1): 262–274. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i1.262
    [13] CHEN H, ZHANG Y, LI S, et al. Direct comparison of five serum biomarkers in early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Manag Res,2018,10: 1947–1958. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S167036
    [14] CHEN J, WU G, LI Y. Evaluation of serum des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin for the diagnosis of hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Dis Markers,2018,2018: 8906023[2019-05-13].https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8906023. doi: 10.1155/2018/8906023
    [15] JI J, WANG H, LI Y, et al. Diagnostic evaluation of des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin versus α-fetoprotein for hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma in China: a large-scale, multicentre study. PLoS One,2016,11(4): e0153227[2019-05-13]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153227. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153227
    [16] LEE S, RHIM H, KIM Y S, et al. Post-ablation des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin level predicts prognosis in hepatitis B-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Int,2016,36(4): 580–587. doi: 10.1111/liv.12991
    [17] LI Y, CHEN J. Serum des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin for diagnosis of adult primary cancer in liver. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak,2019,29(10): 972–976. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2019.10.972
    [18] LI G J, CHEN Q Y, HARRISON T J, et al. Des-γ carboxyprothrombin may not be a good biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma in those chronically infected with hepatitis B virus with basal core promoter double mutations (T.{1762}, A.{1764}), a prospective study. Cancer Biomark,2017,18(3): 241–248. doi: 10.3233/CBM-160131
    [19] PARK S J, JANG J Y, JEONG S W, et al. Usefulness of AFP, AFP-L3, and PIVKA-II, and their combinations in diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma. Medicine (Baltimore),2017,96(11): e5811[2019-05-13].https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000005811. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005811
    [20] XING H, ZHENG Y J, HAN J, et al. Protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-Ⅱ versus alpha-fetoprotein in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int,2018,17(6): 487–495. doi: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2018.09.009
    [21] BEST J, BECHMANN L P, SOWA J P, et al. GALAD Score detects early hepatocellular carcinoma in an international cohort of patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol,2020,18(3): 728–735. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.11.012
  • 加载中
图(7) / 表(1)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  2770
  • HTML全文浏览量:  830
  • PDF下载量:  45
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2019-06-17
  • 修回日期:  2019-11-09
  • 刊出日期:  2020-05-01

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回