欢迎来到《四川大学学报(医学版)》

脾动脉优先阻断在Kimura法腹腔镜保留脾脏胰腺体尾部切除术中的应用

Application of Early Splenic Artery Occlusion in Laparoscopic Spleen-preserving Distal Pancreatectomy using Kimura Technique

  • 摘要:
      目的  通过总结Kimura法腹腔镜保留脾脏胰腺体尾部切除术(laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy, Lap-SPDP)中应用优先阻断和未阻断脾动脉的手术经验,探讨脾动脉优先阻断Kimura法Lap-SPDP术的安全性和可行性,特别是此方法在控制术中出血和成功保留脾脏方面的优势。
      方法  在2011年2月至2019年5月期间,连续纳入54例经B超或CT检查提示“胰腺体尾部良性或低度恶性占位性病变”的患者行Kimura法Lap-SPDP术。2015年以前的患者纳入未阻断组(n=25,未阻断脾动脉),2015年以后的患者纳入阻断组(n=29,行脾动脉优先阻断)。未阻断组横断胰腺颈部后脾动脉只做常规牵引带牵引,保留脾动脉供血,完成胰腺体尾部切除;阻断组在横断胰腺颈部后予bulldog钳在脾动脉根部暂时阻断脾动脉,在脾动脉无供血状态下切除胰腺体尾部。回顾性收集两组患者资料,将两组患者按肿瘤直径>3 cm和≤3 cm分层进行比较,并详细描述阻断脾动脉Kimura法的手术技巧。
      结果  分层前,未阻断组与阻断组间比较,年龄差异有统计学意义(P=0.033),而体质量指数差异无统计学意义(P=0.069)。两组的肿瘤的中位直径分别为2.5 cm和4.0 cm,差异无统计学意义(P=0.065)。两组的保留脾脏成功率分别为93.1%和92%,但差异无统计学意义(P=1.000)。未阻断组的住院时间稍长于阻断组(P=0.020)。与未阻断组相比较,阻断组的中位手术时间(165 min vs. 235 min)和中位术中出血量(100 mL vs. 200 mL)均减少,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。按肿瘤直径分层后,肿瘤直径>3 cm者阻断组(25%)和未阻断组(14.3%)各有2例保留脾脏失败,但两组间比较差异无统计学意义(P=0.602)。而在肿瘤直径≤3 cm时两组保留脾脏率均达到了100%。肿瘤直径>3 cm时,阻断组比未阻断组手术用时少(P=0.005)。无论是在>3 cm组还是在≤3 cm组,阻断组均较未阻断组出血量少(P均<0.05)。阻断组无中转开腹和术中或术后需输血者。分层后两组间住院时间均无差异(P均>0.05)。中位随访时间13.5(3~96)个月。随访期间,无围手术期死亡、疾病复发、门静脉或脾静脉血栓发生,无胃底静脉曲张或上消化道出血。
      结论  脾动脉优先阻断的Kimura法Lap-SPDP术安全、可行,该法在获得较高的保留脾脏成功率的同时,缩短了手术时间,减少了术中出血量,值得推广。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective   To present our institutional experience in laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (Lap-SPDP) using Kimura technique with or without early occlusion of the root of the splenic artery. In addition, to explore the safety and feasibility of this occlusion technique, especially its advantages in intraoperative hemorrhage control and spleen preservation.
      Methods   From February 2011 to May 2019, 54 consecutive patients who were diagnosed as benign or low-grade malignant space-occupying lesions at the body and the tail of pancreas underwent Lap-SPDP using Kimura technique in our institution. Twenty-five patients before 2015 were allocated into non-occlusion group and 29 patients after 2015 were allocated into occlusion group. The non-occlusion group underwent direct dissection of the distal pancreas with blood supply from the splenic artery as well as traditional traction of the splenic artery without occlusion. Whereas the occlusion group underwent temporary occlusion of the root of the splenic artery by Bulldog clip after transecting the neck of the pancreas and distal pancreas was excised under a relatively bloodless situation. Surgical techniques were described in detail. Data between groups were retrospectively collected and stratification analysis was performed based on the diameter of tumor (>3 cm or ≤3 cm).
      Results   Before stratification, there was a statistical difference in age between the two groups (P=0.033), but no difference in body mass index (BMI) (P=0.069). The median lesion diameter of the two groups was 2.5 cm and 4 cm, respectively, with no statistical difference (P=0.065). The success rates of spleen preservation in the two groups were 93.1% and 92% respectively, showing no significant difference (P=1.000). The length of hospital stay was slightly longer in the non-occlusion group than that in the occlusion group (P=0.020). Comparing with the non-occlusion group, the occlusion group had significantly shorter operation time (median, 165 min vs. 235 min) and less estimated blood loss (median, 100 mL vs. 200 mL) (P<0.05). After stratification by the tumor diameter, there were 2 cases of failed spleen preservation both in occlusion and non-occlusion group with tumor diameter >3 cm (occlusion group: 2/8, 25% and non-occlusion group: 2/14,14.3%). However there was no statistical difference between the two groups (P=0.602). When the tumor diameter ≤3 cm, the spleen preservation rate of both groups reached 100%. When the tumor diameter was >3 cm, the operation time of the occlusion group was shorter than that of the non-occlusion group (P=0.005). In terms of intraoperative blood loss, regardless of tumor size, the occlusion group had less estimated blood loss than that of the non-occlusion group (P<0.05). In the occlusion group, no conversion or blood transfusion was needed intraoperatively and/or postoperatively. After stratification, there was no difference in the length of hospital stay between two groups (P>0.05). During the follow-up period (median (Min-Max), 13.5 (3-96) months), no perioperative death, disease recurrence, portal vein or splenic vein thrombosis, gastric varices or upper gastrointestinal bleeding was noted.
      Conclusion  Lap-SPDP using Kimura technique with early occlusion of the root of splenic artery was safe and feasible and could be generally applied. By using this technique, we could reduce the operation time and blood loss, as well as sustain a high probability of spleen preservation.

     

/

返回文章
返回