欢迎来到《四川大学学报(医学版)》
杜芹, 刘向红, 田鲲, 等. 类风湿性关节炎患者牙周状况及唾液微生物多样性分析[J]. 四川大学学报(医学版), 2019, 50(6): 935-940.
引用本文: 杜芹, 刘向红, 田鲲, 等. 类风湿性关节炎患者牙周状况及唾液微生物多样性分析[J]. 四川大学学报(医学版), 2019, 50(6): 935-940.
DU Qin, LIU Xiang-hong, TIAN Kun, et al. Analysis of Periodontal Status and Salivary Microbial Diversity in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis[J]. Journal of Sichuan University (Medical Sciences), 2019, 50(6): 935-940.
Citation: DU Qin, LIU Xiang-hong, TIAN Kun, et al. Analysis of Periodontal Status and Salivary Microbial Diversity in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis[J]. Journal of Sichuan University (Medical Sciences), 2019, 50(6): 935-940.

类风湿性关节炎患者牙周状况及唾液微生物多样性分析

Analysis of Periodontal Status and Salivary Microbial Diversity in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

  • 摘要:
      目的  观察类风湿性关节炎(rheumatoid arthritis,RA)患者牙周状况及唾液微生物的多样性,分析RA患者口腔微生物菌群构成特点与类风湿性关节炎发病的相关性。
      方法  选取确诊RA患者24例和正常对照20例,记录牙周临床指标〔牙周探诊深度(probing depth,PD),探诊出血(bleeding on probing,BOP),临床附着丧失(clinical attachment loss,CAL)〕,同时收集非刺激性唾液,提取唾液DNA后进行高通量测序,并进行数据分析。
      结果  RA组牙周临床指标中PD和BOP略高于健康对照组,但PD(P=0.65),BOP(P=0.27)和CAL(P=0.508)三个指标差异均无统计学意义。RA患者和健康对照组唾液微生物α多样性差异无统计学意义。在门水平上,共发现13个门,其中厚壁菌门Firmicutes(30.2%)、变形菌门Proteobacteria(29.3%)、拟杆菌门Bacteroidetes(23.8%)、梭杆菌门Fusobacteria(7.3%)、放线菌门Actinobacteria(5.6%)为优势菌门,RA组拟杆菌门Bacteroidetes (P=0.04)和螺旋体门Spirochaetes(P=0.01)的含量高于健康对照组。在属水平上共发现144个菌属,优势菌属共12个,RA组及健康对照组在属水平上共发现11个菌属差异有统计学意义,RA组普雷沃菌属Prevotella (P=0.03)、卟啉单胞菌属Porphyromonas (P=0.005 7)、密螺旋体属Treponema (P=0.001 9)及坦纳菌属Tannerella(P=0.010)含量高于健康对照组。RA组组内微生物群落相似度高于健康对照组。
      结论  与健康人群相比,RA患者的牙周临床指标中PD和BOP略高于健康对照组,但差异无统计学意义。与健康人群相比,RA患者口腔唾液具有独特微生物多样性结构,两者间口腔微生物菌群结构有所区别。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To observe the periodontal status and salivary microbial diversity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, and to analyze the relationship between the composition of oral microflora in patients with RA and the incidence of rheumatoid arthritis.
      Methods  24 patients who were diagnosed as rheumatoid arthritis were enrolled in the experimental group, and 20 healthy persons were enrolled in the control group. The periodontal index was recorded and non-irritating saliva was collected. DNA was extracted and high-throughput sequencing was performed.
      Results  There were no significant differences in periodontal indices between the RA group and the control group. After analysis of salivary microorganisms in RA patients and control group, there was no significant difference in salivary microbial diversity between RA patients and control group. At the phylum level, 13 phyla were found, including Firmicutes (30.2%), Proteobacteria (29.3%), Bacteroidetes (23.8%), Fusobacteria (7.3%), Actinobacteria (5.6%) as dominant bacteria. Bacteroidetes (P=0.04) and spirochoetes (P=0.01) were significantly higher in the RA group. A total of 144 genus were found, and 12 dominant genus were found. 11 genuses were found to have significant difference between the RA group and the control. At the genus level, Prevotella (P=0.03), Porphyromonas (P=0.005 7), Tannerella (P=0.001 9) and Treponema (P=0.010) were significantly higher in the RA group. Salivary microbial community similarity in the RA group was significantly higher than that in the control group.
      Conclusion  Compared with healthy people, RA patients had higher periodontal inflammation indices, but there was no statistical difference. The oral saliva of patients with rheumatoid arthritis has a unique microbial diversity structure. This result provides a new insight for understanding the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis.

     

© 2019 《四川大学学报(医学版)》编辑部 版权所有 cc

开放获取 本文遵循知识共享署名—非商业性使用4.0国际许可协议(CC BY-NC 4.0),允许第三方对本刊发表的论文自由共享(即在任何媒介以任何形式复制、发行原文)、演绎(即修改、转换或以原文为基础进行创作),必须给出适当的署名,提供指向本文许可协议的链接,同时标明是否对原文作了修改;不得将本文用于商业目的。CC BY-NC 4.0许可协议详情请访问 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

/

返回文章
返回