欢迎来到《四川大学学报(医学版)》
谭培勇, 陈尽欢, 李鹏等. 下颌骨CT三维重建中阈值分割的改进及应用[J]. 四川大学学报(医学版), 2015, 46(3): 458-462.
引用本文: 谭培勇, 陈尽欢, 李鹏等. 下颌骨CT三维重建中阈值分割的改进及应用[J]. 四川大学学报(医学版), 2015, 46(3): 458-462.
TAN Pei-yong, CHEN Jin-huan, LI Peng. et al. Improving Threshold Segmentation in 3D Reconstruction of Mandible CT Image[J]. Journal of Sichuan University (Medical Sciences), 2015, 46(3): 458-462.
Citation: TAN Pei-yong, CHEN Jin-huan, LI Peng. et al. Improving Threshold Segmentation in 3D Reconstruction of Mandible CT Image[J]. Journal of Sichuan University (Medical Sciences), 2015, 46(3): 458-462.

下颌骨CT三维重建中阈值分割的改进及应用

Improving Threshold Segmentation in 3D Reconstruction of Mandible CT Image

  • 摘要: 目的 对下颌胃CT三维重建中阈值分割方法的不足进行改进,比较改进后的方法与传统方法在下颌骨图像分割中的差别。方法 将12例健康志愿者下颌骨CT数据导入Mimics 10.01,分别用改进方法和传统方法进行图像分割。改进方法首先使用较窄的阈值范围(调节阈值上、下限值至能分离出下颌骨的最宽阈值)进行分割,然后利用膨胀运算弥补因阈值范围过窄造成的边界信息损失,得到一个近似分割结果,再结合逻辑运算及区域生长工具,得到精确的分割结果。测量两种方法分割所花时间的平均值,并用Geomagic Studio 11.0比较其重建后结果间的差异。结果 改进后的方法成功率为91.67%(11/12);分割时间为(319.7±125.3) s,小于传统方法的分割时间〔(1 261.3±427.3) s,P<0.05〕。以传统方法重建结果作为参照目标,改进后方法朝外的偏差为(0.066±0.011) mm,朝内的偏差为(0.070±0.008) mm,误差远小于肉眼分辨距离。能分离出下颌骨的最宽阈值范围下限为(507.72±100.31) HU,上限为(1 133.33±47.57) HU。结论 本研究提出的阈值分割改进方法能明显提高阈值分割方法分割下颌骨的效率。

     

    Abstract: Objective To develop a new threshold segmentation method for mandible image segmentation. Methods CT data of 12 volunteers were exported into Mimics 10.01.An improved method usinga narrowed threshold range (the maximum threshold range that can segment mandible without manual efforts) was developed in 3D reconstruction, and compared with the traditional method. We used dilation operations to make up the information loss of image borders, by which we obtained an approximate segment result. A precise segment resultwas eventually arrived with the help of logical operations and region growing. We compared mean time consumptions of the two methods, as well as their 3D reconstruction results using Geomagic Studio 11.0. Results The new method generated a success rate of 91.67% (11/12), with a mean time consumption of (319.7±125.3) s. The traditional method took much longer time 〔(1 261.3±427.3) s, P<0.05〕 than the new method. Compared with the reconstruction results of traditional method, the new method had an outward deviation of (0.066±0.011) mm and an inward deviation of (0.070±0.008) mm. Such deviations were less than the minimum distance that a naked eye can discern.The lower limit of the widest threshold range which mandible could be isolated was (507.72±100.31) HU, while the upper limit was (1 133.33±47.57) HU. Conclusion The new method we proposed can improve the efficiency of threshold segmentation of mandible.

     

© 2015 《四川大学学报(医学版)》编辑部 版权所有 cc

开放获取 本文遵循知识共享署名—非商业性使用4.0国际许可协议(CC BY-NC 4.0),允许第三方对本刊发表的论文自由共享(即在任何媒介以任何形式复制、发行原文)、演绎(即修改、转换或以原文为基础进行创作),必须给出适当的署名,提供指向本文许可协议的链接,同时标明是否对原文作了修改;不得将本文用于商业目的。CC BY-NC 4.0许可协议详情请访问 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

/

返回文章
返回