欢迎来到《四川大学学报(医学版)》
熊雯, 罗红. 常规超声联合超声造影诊断胎盘植入的应用价值[J]. 四川大学学报(医学版), 2017, 48(2): 253-256.
引用本文: 熊雯, 罗红. 常规超声联合超声造影诊断胎盘植入的应用价值[J]. 四川大学学报(医学版), 2017, 48(2): 253-256.
XIONG Wen, LUO Hong. Convention Ultrasound and Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound Imaging in the Diagnosis of Placenta Implantation[J]. Journal of Sichuan University (Medical Sciences), 2017, 48(2): 253-256.
Citation: XIONG Wen, LUO Hong. Convention Ultrasound and Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound Imaging in the Diagnosis of Placenta Implantation[J]. Journal of Sichuan University (Medical Sciences), 2017, 48(2): 253-256.

常规超声联合超声造影诊断胎盘植入的应用价值

Convention Ultrasound and Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound Imaging in the Diagnosis of Placenta Implantation

  • 摘要: 【摘要】 目的 探讨常规超声、超声造影以及两者联合诊断胎盘植入的应用价值。方法 收集2013年4月至2016年3月经手术病理诊断为胎盘残留的患者112例,根据病理诊断分为非植入组(n =38)和植入组(n =74)。比较两组常规超声、超声造影特征的区别,以多因素logistic回归建立判别式并比较三种方法预报胎盘残留是否伴有植入的准确性,比较三种方法ROC曲线的曲线下面积(AUC )。结果 常规超声检查发现宫腔内病灶,发现病灶与周围子宫肌层的分界是否清楚在两组间差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。超声造影的定性分析指标〔包括增强时相、增强强度、造影后病灶与子宫肌层分界是否清楚、边界是否规整、病灶附着处子宫肌层厚度较对侧子宫肌层是否变薄(简称较对侧子宫肌层是否变薄)〕在两组之间差异均有统计学意义(P <0.05)。超声造影(91.1%)以及联合诊断的logit(P )判别式的预报准确性(92.0%)高于常规超声(87.5%),差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。超声造影AUC(0.922)以及联合诊断(0.952)高于常规超声(0.887)(P <0.05),但超声造影和联合诊断之间的预报准确性和AUC差异均无统计学意义。结论 超声造影及联合诊断用于鉴别胎盘植入的价值均高于常规超声,有潜力成为胎盘残留的常规影像诊断方法。

     

    Abstract: 【Abstract】 Objective To determine the value of conventional ultrasound (US) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the diagnosis of placenta residue with implantation. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 112 cases of placenta remnants from Apr. 2013 to Mar. 2016, all of which were confirmed by pathological results. The cases were divided into implanted (n =74) and non-implanted (n =38) groups. We compared the characteristics of US and CEUS imaging between the two groups. Multi-variate logistic regression models were established to assess the accuracy of ultrasound imaging in predicting implantation, including the area under the curve (AUC ) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results US detected intrauterine lesions, with significant differences between the two groups in the clearness of boundaries of lesions (P <0.05) . Differences between the two groups were also found in CEUS in enhanced phase, enhanced intensity, existence of clear and regular boundaries, and reduced muscle thickness in the lesion area (P <0.05). CEUS (91.1%) and US+CEUS (92.0%) had a higher prediction accuracy for placenta implantation compared with US (87.5%) (P <0.05). The AUC of CEUS (0.922) and US+CEUS (0.952) were also significantly higher than that of US (0.887) (P <0.05). No significant differences were observed between CEUS and US+CEUS. Conclusion The value of CEUS for predicting placenta implantation is higher than US.

     

© 2017 《四川大学学报(医学版)》编辑部 版权所有 cc

开放获取 本文遵循知识共享署名—非商业性使用4.0国际许可协议(CC BY-NC 4.0),允许第三方对本刊发表的论文自由共享(即在任何媒介以任何形式复制、发行原文)、演绎(即修改、转换或以原文为基础进行创作),必须给出适当的署名,提供指向本文许可协议的链接,同时标明是否对原文作了修改;不得将本文用于商业目的。CC BY-NC 4.0许可协议详情请访问 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

/

返回文章
返回