Welcome to JOURNAL OF SICHUAN UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCIENCE EDITION)
WANG Zhe-tao, WANG Chun-hua, CHEN Yu-shu, et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Tissue Feature Tracking for Cardiac Amyloidosis[J]. Journal of Sichuan University (Medical Sciences), 2019, 50(4): 466-470.
Citation: WANG Zhe-tao, WANG Chun-hua, CHEN Yu-shu, et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Tissue Feature Tracking for Cardiac Amyloidosis[J]. Journal of Sichuan University (Medical Sciences), 2019, 50(4): 466-470.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Tissue Feature Tracking for Cardiac Amyloidosis

  •   Objective  To detect cardiac amyloidosis (CA) using cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking(CMR-FT).
      Methods  Forty-three CA patients and 24 healthy volunteers underwent steady-state free precession cine sequence on 3.0T MRI after injection of Magnevist. Software cvi 42 was used for analyzing the left ventricular function including left ventricular mass (diastole) (LVMD), left ventricular mass (systole) (LVMS), left ventricle end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), left ventricle end-systolic volume (LVESV), left ventricle stroke volume (LVSV), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), as well as myocardial strains including 3D global longitudinal strain (GLS), global circumferential strain (GCS), and global radial strain (GRS), and 2D endocardial and epicardial longitudinal strain, circumferential strain, and radial strain (ENDO-LS, EPI-LS, ENDO-CS, EPI-CS, ENDO-RS, and EPI-RS). The global and layer-specific strains were compared between the CA patients with LVEF >50%, the CA patients with LVEF ≤50%, and the healthy controls.
      Results  For the left ventricular function, the CA patients had greater myocardial mass than the healthy controls (P < 0.05); the CA patients with LVEF ≤50% had greater LVESV and lower LVSV than those with LVEF >50% (P < 0.05). For the global strains, significant differences also appeared in GLS and GCS among the three groups (all P < 0.05). The CA patients had lower GRS than the healthy controls (P < 0.05), while no significant difference was found in GRS between the CA patients with LVEF >50% and those with LVEF ≤50% (P>0.05). For the layer-specific strains, significant differences in ENDO-LS, EPI-LS, ENDO-CS, EPI-CS, ENDO-RS, and EPI-RS were found among the three groups (all P < 0.05). There were significant correlations between GLS and LVEF (r=-0.404, P=0.016), and between GCS and LVEF (r=-0.602, P < 0.001) in the CA patients.
      Conclusion  CMR-FT can assess not only global strains but also layer-specific strains for the myocardial function of CA patients.
  • loading

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return