Objective To investigate the impact of endometriosis on the therapeutic effect of hysteroscopic fallopian tube catheterization combined with laparoscopy in infertile patients with proximal tubal obstruction.
Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent hysteroscopic fallopian tube catheterization combined with laparoscopy for infertility caused by proximal fallopian tube obstruction between January 19, 2016 and March 20, 2020 at the Department of Reproductive Endocrinology, West China Second Hospital, Sichuan University. During the operation, hydrotubation was performed to verify whether there was proximal tubal obstruction. Then, the patients were categorized into an endometriosis group and a non-endometriosis group according to whether their proximal tubal obstruction was combined with endometriosis. The baseline data were balanced by propensity score matching and the rate of successful surgical unblocking of proximal tubal obstruction in infertile patients by hysteroscopic fallopian tube catheterization combined with laparoscopy was calculated. Treating cases lost to follow-up in both groups as non-pregnant cases according to the principle of intention-to-treat analysis, we followed up the pregnancy outcomes after surgery. The primary indicators included overall successful surgical unblocking rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and spontaneous pregnancy rate, while the secondary indicators included live birth rate, miscarriage rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, and the mean time to spontaneous pregnancy after surgery. The primary indicators included overall successful surgical unblocking rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and spontaneous conception rate, while the secondary indicators included live birth rate, miscarriage rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, and the mean time to spontaneous pregnancy after surgery.
Results After propensity score matching, 113 cases were included in each of the two groups, with the overall successful surgical unblocking rate being 72.6%. The successful surgical unblocking rate of patients in the endometriosis group was higher than that of the non-endometriosis group, with the difference being statistically significant (78.8% vs. 66.4%, P<0.05). A total of 38 patients were lost after follow-up matching. Postoperative follow-up was performed to date and, through intention-to-treat analysis, the spontaneous conception rate was found to be higher in the endometriosis group than that in the non-endometriosis group (44.2% vs. 30.1%, P<0.05), while the mean time to spontaneous pregnancy after surgery was shorter in the endometriosis group than that in the non-endometriosis group (46 months vs. 53 months, P<0.05). There was no significant difference in clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate, miscarriage rate, and ectopic pregnancy rate between the endometriosis group and the non-endometriosis group (P>0.05).
Conclusion When infertility caused by proximal tubal obstruction is combined with endometriosis, performing hysteroscopic fallopian tube catheterization combined with laparoscopy contributes to the improvement of reproduction outcomes.