欢迎来到《四川大学学报(医学版)》
郝杰兵, 马敬斋, 张景霞. Sommerlad法与两瓣法在腭裂修复中的初步比较[J]. 四川大学学报(医学版), 2013, 44(5): 843-844,853.
引用本文: 郝杰兵, 马敬斋, 张景霞. Sommerlad法与两瓣法在腭裂修复中的初步比较[J]. 四川大学学报(医学版), 2013, 44(5): 843-844,853.
HAO Jie-bing, MA Jing-zhai, ZHANG Jing-xia. A Comparison of 2-flap and Sommerlad in Surgical Repair of Cleft Palate[J]. Journal of Sichuan University (Medical Sciences), 2013, 44(5): 843-844,853.
Citation: HAO Jie-bing, MA Jing-zhai, ZHANG Jing-xia. A Comparison of 2-flap and Sommerlad in Surgical Repair of Cleft Palate[J]. Journal of Sichuan University (Medical Sciences), 2013, 44(5): 843-844,853.

Sommerlad法与两瓣法在腭裂修复中的初步比较

A Comparison of 2-flap and Sommerlad in Surgical Repair of Cleft Palate

  • 摘要: 目的 通过比较Sommerlad法与两瓣法两种腭裂修复方法,分析何种术式更适用于腭裂的治疗。 方法 对既往完成的30例腭裂患者15例采用sommerlad法(单侧完全性9例,不完全性6例),15例采用两瓣法(单侧完全性10例,不完全性5例)施行手术,行手术情况及术后3~6月后部分指标比较。 结果 Sommerlad法的手术时间多于两瓣法,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),Sommerlad法失血量少于两瓣法(P<0.05),两法术后软腭动度、腭咽闭合功能差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),Sommerlad法术后软腭瓣痕优于两瓣法(P<0.05)。 结论 两法均有较好的腭裂修复效果,术者应根据患者的畸形情况和术者对两种方法的掌握程度选择使用。

     

    Abstract: Objective To compare 2-flap and Sommerlad in surgical repair of cleft palate. Methods 30 patients with cleft palate were equally divided into two groups.One group accepted sommerlad operation (9 unilateral complete and 6 incomplete cases); the other group accepted 2-flap operation (10 unilateral complete and 5 incomplete cases). Results Sommerlad operation lasted longer than 2-flap operation, but without statistical significance (P>0.05). The two types operations produced similar functional recovery (P>0.05). The Sommerlad operation had less intraoperation blood loss and left softer palate scars than the 2-flap operation (P<0.05). Conclusion Sommerlad operation and 2-flap operation are both effective. Different methods should be considered based on the abnormal situation of patients and the operation proficiency of the surgeons.

     

/

返回文章
返回