欢迎来到《四川大学学报(医学版)》
陈颖, 张丹. 克罗米芬抵抗和来曲唑无反应的PCOS患者促排卵方案的选择[J]. 四川大学学报(医学版), 2016, 47(6): 874-877.
引用本文: 陈颖, 张丹. 克罗米芬抵抗和来曲唑无反应的PCOS患者促排卵方案的选择[J]. 四川大学学报(医学版), 2016, 47(6): 874-877.
CHEN Ying, ZHANG Dan. Optimal Ovulation Induction in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Resistant to Clomiphene Citrate or Letrozole[J]. Journal of Sichuan University (Medical Sciences), 2016, 47(6): 874-877.
Citation: CHEN Ying, ZHANG Dan. Optimal Ovulation Induction in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Resistant to Clomiphene Citrate or Letrozole[J]. Journal of Sichuan University (Medical Sciences), 2016, 47(6): 874-877.

克罗米芬抵抗和来曲唑无反应的PCOS患者促排卵方案的选择

Optimal Ovulation Induction in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Resistant to Clomiphene Citrate or Letrozole

  • 摘要: 目的 比较来曲唑(LE)、克罗米芬(CC)、人绝经期促性腺激素(HMG)3种药物相互联合使用的疗效与安全性,探索CC抵抗及LE无反应的多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)患者更佳的促排卵方案。方法 将CC抵抗及LE无反应的209例(周期)PCOS患者,随机分入CC+HMG组59周期,LE+HMG组72周期,LE+CC组78周期, LE+CC组中无反应者54周期立即转入LE+CC+HMG组,观察4组间绒毛膜促性腺激素(HCG)注射日,最大卵泡平均直径(MFD)、子宫内膜厚度、>1.4 cm卵泡数、血清雌二醇(E2)水平,以及促排天数、HMG用量、排卵数、临床妊娠率、生化妊娠率、早期流产率、双胎率、异位妊娠率等。结果 LE+CC组排卵率最低(30.77%),但>1.4 cm卵泡数、排卵数和促排天数最少,HCG注射日E2水平最低(P<0.05),余3组排卵率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);LE+CC+HMG组HMG用量以及HCG注射日E2水平最高(P<0.05);仅CC+HMG组出现异位妊娠,共3周期(P<0.05)。4组HCG日子宫内膜厚度、MFD、临床妊娠率、生化妊娠率、早期流产率以及双胎率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),均未发生中-重度卵巢过度刺激综合征(OHSS)及卵泡未破裂黄素化(LUF)。 结论 对CC抵抗及LE无反应的PCOS患者,LE+CC联合促排卵方案,仍有30.77%的排卵率,尤其适合OHSS高危人群。而LE+CC与LE+CC+HMG的总体排卵率92.31%,明显高于传统联合促排卵方案LE+HMG与CC+HMG,同时降低了OHSS及多胎妊娠的风险。

     

    Abstract: Objective To investigate the optimal ovulation induction with the combination of combining letrozole(LE),clomiphene citrate (CC), and human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) in polycystic ovary syndrome(PCOS) patients resistant to CC or LE. Methods Two hundreds nine PCOS patients (209 cycles) resistant to CC or LE were randomly divided into three groups: CC+HMG group (59 cycles), LE+HMG group (72 cycles) and LE+CC group (78 cycles). The patients in LE+CC group unable to form the dominant follicle after 54 cycles were enrolled into LE+CC+HMG group. Maximum follicle diameter (MFD), endometrial thickness, number of follicles (diameter>1.4 cm), the level of serum estradiol (E2) were measured on the day of HMG administration. Also these results were observed and compared including the duration of treatment, dosage of HMG, number of ovulated follicles, clinical pregnancy rate, biochemical pregnancy rate, early abortion rate, twinning rate, and ectopic pregnancy rate. Results The ovulation rate was significantly lower in LE+CC group (30.77%) (P<0.05), but similar in the other three groups. The number of >1.4 cm follicles and ovulated follicles, ovulation duration and E2 concentration in LE+CC group were also at a lower level (P<0.05). The patients in LE+CC+HMG group showed higher E2 level and more HMG consumption (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference in endometrial thickness, MFD, clinical pregnancy rate, biochemical pregnancy rate, early abortion rate and twinning rate among these groups (P>0.05). No severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) or luteinized unruptured follicle (LUF) occurred. Conclusion Combintion of LE with CC could achieve 1/3 ovulation induction in PCOS resistant to CC or LE alone. When both combined with HMG, the induction of ovulation could be significantly higher than LE+HMG and CC+HMG, while the risk of multiple pregnancy and OHSS was reduced.

     

/

返回文章
返回