欢迎来到《四川大学学报(医学版)》
杨胜涛, 周密, 袁泉, 等. 三种环境光源对于高透分层氧化锆颜色的影响[J]. 四川大学学报(医学版), 2022, 53(1): 105-108. DOI: 10.12182/20220160105
引用本文: 杨胜涛, 周密, 袁泉, 等. 三种环境光源对于高透分层氧化锆颜色的影响[J]. 四川大学学报(医学版), 2022, 53(1): 105-108. DOI: 10.12182/20220160105
YANG Sheng-tao, ZHOU Mi, YUAN Quan, et al. Effects of Three Illuminants on the Color of High Translucent Multilayered Zirconia[J]. Journal of Sichuan University (Medical Sciences), 2022, 53(1): 105-108. DOI: 10.12182/20220160105
Citation: YANG Sheng-tao, ZHOU Mi, YUAN Quan, et al. Effects of Three Illuminants on the Color of High Translucent Multilayered Zirconia[J]. Journal of Sichuan University (Medical Sciences), 2022, 53(1): 105-108. DOI: 10.12182/20220160105

三种环境光源对于高透分层氧化锆颜色的影响

Effects of Three Illuminants on the Color of High Translucent Multilayered Zirconia

  • 摘要:
      目的  研究三种常见环境光源对于四种品牌高透分层氧化锆材料颜色的影响,以对临床操作及修复体制作提供参考,降低由于光源的改变导致的高透分层氧化锆修复体与天然牙颜色失匹配的风险。
      方法  选择四种品牌常用高透分层氧化锆,将其制备为12 mm×10 mm×0.8 mm的方形试样各10个(n=10),分别测量各品牌试样在标准D65光源、A光源及F2光源下的L*、a*、b*值。对同种品牌不同光源及同一光源下不同品牌试样之间的L*、a*、b*值进行统计学分析,并计算同一品牌的试样在不同光源条件下的色差ΔE。
      结果  同一品牌不同光源之间的L*值差异无统计学意义;对于a*值,A光源>F2光源>D65光源;对于b*值,F2光源>D65光源>A光源。在同种光源下,不同品牌试样之间的L*、a*、b*值差异均有统计学意义(P<0.000 1)。同一品牌试样在三种不同环境光源条件下存在色差,且均在临床可接受范围内。
      结论  环境光源对于高透分层氧化锆的色调及饱和度均有一定的影响,同一颜色不同品牌高透分层氧化锆修复体间存在色度学上的差异,临床材料选择及修复体制作时需要参考患者生活的光源条件及不同品牌材料的颜色特性,降低由于光源不同而带来的修复体与邻牙颜色失匹配的风险。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective   To evaluate the effects of three common illuminants on the color of four brands of high translucent multilayered zirconia (HTMZ) ceramics so as to provide reference for clinical practice and dental restoration fabrication, and to reduce the risks for illuminant change causing color mismatch between the natural teeth and the restorations made of HTMZ.
      Methods   Four brands of commonly used HTMZ were selected and ten cuboid samples (n=10/group) of 12 mm×10 mm×0.8 mm were prepared for each type of HTMZ. The L*, a*, and b* values of the samples were measured under D65, A and F2, three standard illuminants. Then, the L*, a*, and b* values were statistically analyzed by using factors of the type of the illuminant and the brand of the zirconia. Color difference (ΔE) of samples of the same brand under exposure to changed illuminants was also calculated.
      Results   When the same samples were exposure to different illuminants, there was no significant difference in the L* value, the a* value for the different iluminants was shown to be illuminant A>illuminant F2>illuminant D65, and the b* value was shown to be illuminant F2>illuminant D65>illuminant A. The L*, a*, and b* values of samples of different brands showed statistically significant difference when they were exposed to the same illuminant (P<0.0001). Samples of the same brand showed ΔE when they were under the three different illuninants, and all ΔE were clinically acceptable.
      Conclusion  The types of illuminant used, to a certain degree, affected the hue and chroma of HTMZ. There were colorimetric differences between restorations made of different brands of HTMZ ceramics of the same color. The types of illuminants most common to the daily life of patients and the color characteristics of materials of different brands should be taken into consideration to facilitate the selection of restoration materials and dental restoration fabrication, and to reduce the risks for color mismatch between the restorations and the adjacent teeth caused by the change of illuminants.

     

© 2022 《四川大学学报(医学版)》编辑部 版权所有 cc

开放获取 本文遵循知识共享署名—非商业性使用4.0国际许可协议(CC BY-NC 4.0),允许第三方对本刊发表的论文自由共享(即在任何媒介以任何形式复制、发行原文)、演绎(即修改、转换或以原文为基础进行创作),必须给出适当的署名,提供指向本文许可协议的链接,同时标明是否对原文作了修改;不得将本文用于商业目的。CC BY-NC 4.0许可协议详情请访问 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

/

返回文章
返回