欢迎来到《四川大学学报(医学版)》

大学生轻中度抑郁症患者体育运动干预的效果分析

Effects of Physical Exercise Intervention on Mild-to-Moderate Depression in College Students

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨大学生轻中度抑郁症患者进行体育运动干预的效果,为指导其治疗提供依据。
    方法 选取2022年1月–2024年3月新乡医学院第二附属医院收治的108例大学生轻中度抑郁症患者为研究对象,按就诊时间分为对照组与体育运动组,各54例。对照组给予常规药物治疗,体育运动组在常规药物治疗基础上联合为期8周的有氧运动干预。评估两组的主要结局指标(临床疗效)及次要结局指标,包括汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD-24)评分、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)评分、事件相关电位P300(潜伏期与波幅)、血清下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺轴相关指标〔促肾上腺皮质激素(adrenocorticotropic hormone, ACTH)与皮质醇(cortisol, Cor)〕水平,以及世界卫生组织生活质量测定量表简表(WHOQOL-BREF)评分。
    结果 主要结局:治疗后,体育运动组的临床疗效等级优于对照组(Z=2.546,P=0.011);次要结局:治疗后,两组HAMD-24、PSQI评分均下降(P<0.05),且体育运动组HAMD-24、PSQI评分更低(P<0.05);两组事件相关电位P300潜伏期均缩短且体育运动组更短(P<0.05),波幅均增大且体育运动组更大(P<0.05);两组ACTH、Cor水平均降低且体育运动组低于对照组(P<0.05);两组生活质量评分均升高且体育运动组评分更高(P<0.05)。
    结论 体育运动可以调节大学生轻中度抑郁症患者下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺轴功能,减轻其抑郁程度,促进大脑认知功能恢复,提高患者睡眠质量和生活质量。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To explore the effect of physical exercise intervention on mild-to-moderate depression in college students, and to provide empirical evidence for informing treatment.
    Methods A total of 108 college students with mild-to-moderate depression receiving care at the outpatient department and inpatient department of the Second Affiliated Hospital, Xinxiang Medical University between January 2022 and March 2024 were enrolled. The participants were divided into a control group (n = 54) and a physical exercise group (n = 54) according to the time of consultation. The control group received conventional drug therapy, whereas the physical exercise group was an aerobic exercise intervention regimen in addition to the routine drug therapy. Both groups were treated for 8 weeks. The primary outcome indicator (clinical efficacy) and secondary outcome indicators, including the 24-Item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-24) score, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) score, the P300 component of the event-related potential (latency and amplitude), the serum levels of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis-related indicators (adrenocorticotropic hormone ACTH and cortisol Cor), and the World Health Organization Quality of Life-Brief scale (WHOQOL-BREF) score, before and after intervention were measured and compared between the two groups.
    Results Comparison of the primary outcome indicator revealed that, after treatment, the efficacy grading in the physical exercise group was better than that in the control group (Z = 2.546, P = 0.011). Regarding secondary outcomes, both groups showed significant reductions in HAMD-24 and PSQI scores after treatment (P < 0.05), with the physical exercise group demonstrating lower scores than the control group (P < 0.05). Event-related potential P300 latency was shortened in both groups, and the reduction was greater in the physical exercise group (P < 0.05). P300 amplitude increased in both groups, with a larger increase observed in the physical exercise group (P < 0.05). Levels of ACTH and cortisol decreased across groups, with lower values in the physical exercise group compared with controls (P < 0.05). Quality-of-life scores improved in both groups, with the physical exercise group reporting higher scores than the control group (P < 0.05).
    Conclusion Physical exercise can regulate the function of the HPA axis of college students with mild-to-moderate depression, alleviate their depressive symptoms, promote the recovery of cognitive function, and improve the sleep quality and quality of life of patients.

     

/

返回文章
返回