欢迎来到《四川大学学报(医学版)》

医务人员医防融合知信行现状与影响路径研究

Current Status and Effect Pathways of Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Medical Care and Prevention Integration Among Medical Professionals

  • 摘要:
    目的 探究国家传染病防控医防协同医防融合试点城市医疗机构医务人员对于医防融合的知信行情况变化及其作用路径,为推动医防融合工作开展与完善相关政策提供实证依据。
    方法 本研究以国家层面传染病防控医防协同医防融合试点地区的医疗机构从事医防融合相关工作的医务人员作为研究对象,采用多阶段抽样选择研究样本,基于“知信行”理论框架设计调查问卷,在试点工作开始前(基线期)及一年后(末期)进行两次断面调查,对样本进行倾向性得分匹配(propensity score matching, PSM)后采用描述性统计、假设检验等方法对问卷资料进行统计分析,并拟合结构方程模型,了解调查对象对医防融合的知信行现状及作用路径。
    结果 本研究共获得样本11472例,经PSM后纳入10627例,其中政策实施前样本5007例,政策实施后样本5620例,两组样本在人口学变量上的分布差异无统计学意义。基线期样本对医防融合的知信行得分分别为13.32±0.05、15.62±0.04、6.37±0.02,末期得分分别为13.69±0.05、15.74±0.04、6.51±0.02,得分均有所提高(P<0.05)。按医疗机构级别分层后发现,医务人员对于医防融合的认知与行为改变较明显(P<0.05),但态度并无显著改善(P>0.05),基层医疗机构医务人员对于医防融合工作的认知、态度以及工作频率普遍优于二、三级医院(P<0.001),二级医院医务人员的认知、态度、行为均未产生明显改变(P>0.05)。医防融合的认知程度对行为的作用〔标化路径系数=0.496,95%置信区间(confidence interval, CI):0.482~0.508〕强于态度对行为的作用(标化路径系数=0.267,95%CI:0.244~0.290),对行为影响的直接效应(78.0%)大于以态度作为中介的间接效应(22.0%)。
    结论 国家传染病防控医防协同医防融合试点对提升医务人员医防融合的知信行有积极意义,医务人员对医防融合的认知程度是影响行为的主要因素。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective  To investigate the changes in knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) regarding the integration of medical care and prevention among medical professionals in medical institutions of pilot cities of the collaboration and integration of medical care and prevention, a national pilot program for infectious disease prevention and control, to examine the effect pathways, and to provide empirical evidence for promoting the implementation of the integration of medical care and prevention and improving relevant policies.
    Methods The participants in this study were medical professionals involved in medical care and prevention integration work. The participants were all from medical institutions of pilot cities for the collaboration and integration of medical care and prevention. The study sample was selected through multi-stage sampling. A questionnaire based on the theoretical framework of the KAP model was designed. Two cross-sectional surveys were conducted—once before the initiation of the pilot program (baseline) and again 12 months after implementation (after implementation). After propensity score matching (PSM), descriptive statistics and hypothesis testing were used to statistically analyze the questionnaire data. In addition, a structural equation model (SEM) was applied to assess the current status and effect pathways of the participants' KAP regarding the integration of medical care and prevention.
    Results A total of 11472 responses were collected, and 10627 were included in analysis after PSM, including 5007 before the implementation of the policy and 5620 after the implementation of the policy. No significant differences were observed in demographic variables between the two samples. Baseline scores for knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding the integration of medical care and prevention were 13.32 ± 0.05, 15.62 ± 0.04, and 6.37 ± 0.02 respectively, while the scores at the end of the study were 13.69, 15.74, and 6.51, respectively, all show an increase to a certain degree (P < 0.05). Stratified analysis by institution level revealed relatively significant improvements in knowledge and practice (P < 0.05), but no significant improvement in attitudes (P > 0.05) among medical professionals. Medical professionals in primary medical institutions generally demonstrated superior knowledge, attitudes, and practice frequency compared with those in secondary and tertiary hospitals (P < 0.001). No significant changes in KAP were observed among medical professionals in secondary hospitals (P > 0.05). Regarding the integration of medical care and prevention, the effect of knowledge on practice (standardized path coefficient = 0.496, 95% CI: 0.482, 0.508) was stronger than that of attitude on practice (standardized path coefficient = 0.267, 95% CI: 0.244, 0.290). The direct effect of knowledge on practice (78.0%) was greater than the indirect effect mediated by attitude (22.0%).
    Conclusion  The national pilot program for the collaboration between and integration of medical care and prevention in infectious disease prevention and control has a positive effect on improving the KAP regarding the integration of medical care and prevention among medical professionals. Knowledge of the integration of medical care and prevention is the primary factor influencing practice.

     

/

返回文章
返回