欢迎来到《四川大学学报(医学版)》
冯荣建, 余茜, 李怡, 等. 卒中后认知功能障碍患者肠道菌群紊乱特征研究[J]. 四川大学学报(医学版), 2021, 52(6): 966-974. DOI: 10.12182/20211160507
引用本文: 冯荣建, 余茜, 李怡, 等. 卒中后认知功能障碍患者肠道菌群紊乱特征研究[J]. 四川大学学报(医学版), 2021, 52(6): 966-974. DOI: 10.12182/20211160507
FENG Rong-jian, YU Qian, LI Yi, et al. Dysbiosis of Gut Microbiota in Patients with Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment[J]. Journal of Sichuan University (Medical Sciences), 2021, 52(6): 966-974. DOI: 10.12182/20211160507
Citation: FENG Rong-jian, YU Qian, LI Yi, et al. Dysbiosis of Gut Microbiota in Patients with Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment[J]. Journal of Sichuan University (Medical Sciences), 2021, 52(6): 966-974. DOI: 10.12182/20211160507

卒中后认知功能障碍患者肠道菌群紊乱特征研究

Dysbiosis of Gut Microbiota in Patients with Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment

  • 摘要:
      目的   比较卒中后认知功能障碍(post-stroke cognitive impairment, PSCI)患者与健康人群的肠道菌群结构差异,并探讨差异菌种与认知功能的相关性。
      方法   选取24例患者作为PSCI组,同期匹配23例无心脑血管疾病史的健康人群作为对照组。两组均采集粪便标本,采用简易精神状态检查(Mini-Mental State Examination, MMSE)和蒙特利尔认知评估表(Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA)行认知功能评估。采用16S rRNA基因测序技术进行肠道菌群丰度、多样性和差异性分析,通过RDA/CCA分析差异菌种与认知评分的相关性。
      结果   两组一般资料比较及肠道菌群Alpha多样性差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。组间物种分布比较显示菌群在门和种水平构成存在差异,主要为厚壁菌门、拟杆菌门相对丰度减少和变形菌门相对富集。PSCI组中厚壁菌门的Intestinibacter bartlettii、uncultured bacteriumTyzzerella_3、Fusicatenibacter saccharivorans的相对丰度低于对照组(LDA score>2),且这些细菌与认知功能评分呈正相关,细菌彼此间存在相关性;厚壁菌门的Ruminococcus gnavus、Faecalimonas umbilicata拟杆菌门的unculturedbacterium Prevotellaceae_NK3B31 group的相对丰度高于对照组(LDA score>2),且这些细菌与认知功能评分呈负相关,细菌彼此间亦存在相关性。
      结论   PSCI患者与健康对照比较肠道菌群结构特征存在差异,并且与认知功能存在一定相关性,为PSCI的防治提供了新思路。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective   To identify the differences in the composition of gut microbiota of patients with post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) in comparison with the normal cognition healthy controls (HC), and to study the potential association between gut microbiota and cognition function.
      Methods   A total of 24 patients were recruited for the PSCI group, which was matched with 23 healthy subjects with no history of cardiovascular disease recruited over the same period for the control group. Fecal samples were collected for both groups, and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) were used to evaluate cognitive functions. The abundance, diversity and group difference of gut bacterial communities were determined with 16S rRNA gene sequencing, and the correlations between differences in bacterial species of the gut microbiota and cognitive function scores were examined with redundancy analysis (RDA)/canonical correspondence analysis (CCA).
      Results   There was no significant difference in the general data or the alpha diversity of gut microbiota between the two groups (P>0.05). Inter-group comparison of microbial species composition revealed differences at the phylum and species levels, mainly represented as reduction in the relative abundance of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes, and the relative enrichment of Proteobacteria. The relative abundance ofIntestinibacter bartlettii, uncultured bacterium Tyzzerella_3, Lactobacillus gasseri, and Fusicatenibacter saccharivorans of phylum Firmicutes in the PSCI patients were significantly reduced in comparison to that of the HC (LDA score>2), and these bacteria were positively correlated with MMSE and MoCA scores. In addition, theRuminococcus gnavus and Faecalimonas umbilicata of phylum Firmicutes and unculturedbacteriumPrevotellaceae_NK3B31 group of phylum Bacteroidetes were significantly enriched in comparison with those of the HC (LDA score>2), and these bacteria were negatively correlated with MMSE and MoCA scores. There were also correlations among these bacteria.
      Conclusion   In this study, we observed compositional differences between the gut microbiota of PSCI patients and those of HC, and revealed that the differences were correlated, to some degree, to the cognitive functions, which will provide new perspectives for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of PSCI.

     

© 2021 《四川大学学报(医学版)》编辑部 版权所有 cc

开放获取 本文遵循知识共享署名—非商业性使用4.0国际许可协议(CC BY-NC 4.0),允许第三方对本刊发表的论文自由共享(即在任何媒介以任何形式复制、发行原文)、演绎(即修改、转换或以原文为基础进行创作),必须给出适当的署名,提供指向本文许可协议的链接,同时标明是否对原文作了修改;不得将本文用于商业目的。CC BY-NC 4.0许可协议详情请访问 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

/

返回文章
返回