欢迎来到《四川大学学报(医学版)》
杨裕佳, 张丁月, 阮晓苗, 等. 健康人群A1滑车高频超声测值及其影响因素分析[J]. 四川大学学报(医学版), 2021, 52(1): 104-110. DOI: 10.12182/20201160206
引用本文: 杨裕佳, 张丁月, 阮晓苗, 等. 健康人群A1滑车高频超声测值及其影响因素分析[J]. 四川大学学报(医学版), 2021, 52(1): 104-110. DOI: 10.12182/20201160206
YANG Yu-jia, ZHANG Ding-yue, RUAN Xiao-miao, et al. Thickness of A1 Pulley Measured by High-frequency Ultrasound and Its Influence Factors in Healthy Volunteers[J]. Journal of Sichuan University (Medical Sciences), 2021, 52(1): 104-110. DOI: 10.12182/20201160206
Citation: YANG Yu-jia, ZHANG Ding-yue, RUAN Xiao-miao, et al. Thickness of A1 Pulley Measured by High-frequency Ultrasound and Its Influence Factors in Healthy Volunteers[J]. Journal of Sichuan University (Medical Sciences), 2021, 52(1): 104-110. DOI: 10.12182/20201160206

健康人群A1滑车高频超声测值及其影响因素分析

Thickness of A1 Pulley Measured by High-frequency Ultrasound and Its Influence Factors in Healthy Volunteers

  • 摘要:
      目的  探讨健康人群屈指肌腱A1滑车厚度及其影响因素。
      方法  应用高频超声观察90例健康人双侧手指屈指肌腱的10个A1滑车的声像图,并测量其厚度,同时记录每个人的性别、年龄、身高、体质量及体质量指数。分析手指A1滑车厚度的影响因素。
      结果  高频超声能够清晰显示A1滑车结构;双侧手指A1滑车厚度差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。正常各手指A1滑车厚度差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),进一步比较发现A1滑车厚度可分为两个子集:拇指和小指〔(0.196±0.051) mm〕、食指中指和环指〔(0.230±0.055) mm〕,前者厚度较后者薄;A1滑车厚度与年龄正相关(r=0.468,P<0.001)。拇指与小指在<19岁、20~49岁、≥50岁的正常参考值范围分别为0.09~0.23 mm、0.12~0.30 mm、0.12~0.32 mm;食指、中指及环指在<19岁、20~49岁、≥50岁的正常参考值范围分别为0.11~0.27 mm、0.15~0.35 mm、0.17~0.35 mm。不同性别、不同体质量指数的A1滑车厚度差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
      结论  A1滑车厚度的影响因素为部位、年龄。高频超声可以清晰观察及测量A1滑车,成为A1滑车病变定量评价的候选手段。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To investigate A1 pulley thickness of flexor tendon in healthy volunteers and to analyze its influence factors.
      Methods  The study included 90 healthy volunteers and the A1 pulley thickness at bilateral fingers was measured using high frequency ultrasound. The following parameters were recorded for each participant: age, gender, weight, height, body mass index (BMI).
      Results  High-frequency ultrasound can clearly show A1 pulley. There was no significant difference in A1 pulley thickness between the bilateral fingers (P>0.05). A1 pulley thickness was significantly different in different fingers (P<0.05). Further comparison showed that A1 pulley thickness could be divided into two subsets: thumb and little finger ((0.196±0.051) mm), index, middle and ring fingers ((0.230±0.055) mm). A1 pulley thickness was positively correlated with age (r=0.468, P<0.001). The normal reference ranges for thumb and little finger were 0.09-0.23 mm, 0.12-0.30 mm and 0.12-0.32 mm, respectively. The normal reference ranges for index, middle and ring fingers were 0.11-0.27 mm, 0.15-0.35 mm and 0.17-0.35 mm in volunteers aged 3-19 yr., 20-49 yr., and ≥50 yr., respectively. Gender and BMI had negligible impact on A1 pulley thickness (P>0.05).
      Conclusion  High-frequency ultrasound can clearly show and measure A1 pulley. Site and age should be taken into account when determining the reference range of normal A1 pulley thickness. High-frequency ultrasound can be a quantitative evaluation method for A1 pulley lesions.

     

© 2021 《四川大学学报(医学版)》编辑部 版权所有 cc

开放获取 本文遵循知识共享署名—非商业性使用4.0国际许可协议(CC BY-NC 4.0),允许第三方对本刊发表的论文自由共享(即在任何媒介以任何形式复制、发行原文)、演绎(即修改、转换或以原文为基础进行创作),必须给出适当的署名,提供指向本文许可协议的链接,同时标明是否对原文作了修改;不得将本文用于商业目的。CC BY-NC 4.0许可协议详情请访问 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

/

返回文章
返回