欢迎来到《四川大学学报(医学版)》
赵明, 刘邦喜, 刘新冰, 等. 内镜下钛夹标记在消化性溃疡出血经导管栓塞治疗中的临床作用分析[J]. 四川大学学报(医学版), 2020, 51(3): 434-437. DOI: 10.12182/20200560604
引用本文: 赵明, 刘邦喜, 刘新冰, 等. 内镜下钛夹标记在消化性溃疡出血经导管栓塞治疗中的临床作用分析[J]. 四川大学学报(医学版), 2020, 51(3): 434-437. DOI: 10.12182/20200560604
ZHAO Ming, LIU Bang-xi, LIU Xin-bing, et al. Role of Hemostatic Clips as Guidance during Transcatheter Arterial Embolization in Patients with Peptic Ulcer Bleeding after Endoscopic Treatment Failure[J]. Journal of Sichuan University (Medical Sciences), 2020, 51(3): 434-437. DOI: 10.12182/20200560604
Citation: ZHAO Ming, LIU Bang-xi, LIU Xin-bing, et al. Role of Hemostatic Clips as Guidance during Transcatheter Arterial Embolization in Patients with Peptic Ulcer Bleeding after Endoscopic Treatment Failure[J]. Journal of Sichuan University (Medical Sciences), 2020, 51(3): 434-437. DOI: 10.12182/20200560604

内镜下钛夹标记在消化性溃疡出血经导管栓塞治疗中的临床作用分析

Role of Hemostatic Clips as Guidance during Transcatheter Arterial Embolization in Patients with Peptic Ulcer Bleeding after Endoscopic Treatment Failure

  • 摘要:
      目的  探讨消化性溃疡出血内镜治疗失败后,钛夹标记引导经导管栓塞治疗的可行性及临床效果。
      方法  纳入2009年2月−2018年10月于四川大学华西医院因消化性溃疡出血内镜治疗失败后行经导管栓塞治疗的33例患者为研究对象,观察内镜治疗失败后行经导管栓塞治疗的临床成功率、30 d死亡率及并发症发生情况。
      结果  33例患者内镜检查溃疡出血Forrest分级分别为Ⅰa 8例(24.2%)、Ⅰb 14例(42.5%)、Ⅱa 4例(12.1%)、Ⅱb 7例(21.2%)。8例患者视野差未行内镜治疗,25例患者接受内镜治疗,其中7例初次内镜止血治疗失败,18例内镜下止血成功后发生再出血。内镜治疗失败后距经导管栓塞治疗的平均时间为(35.42±67.54) h。所有患者均行血管造影检查,15例血管造影阴性患者X线下8例可见钛夹标记,钛夹引导下行栓塞治疗,7例未见钛夹标记,其中4例患者接受预防性栓塞治疗;余18例血管造影阳性者均予以栓塞治疗。血管造影阴性的患者钛夹引导经导管栓塞治疗临床治疗成功率为75.0%(6/8),无钛夹引导者临床治疗成功率为为28.6%(2/7),血管造影阳性者经导管栓塞治疗临床治疗成功率为66.7%(12/18)。本研究纳入的患者经导管栓塞治疗总体临床成功率为60.0%,30 d死亡率为20.0%,所有患者均未观察到栓塞治疗相关并发症。
      结论  消化性溃疡出血内镜治疗失败患者,钛夹标记引导经导管栓塞治疗是一种行之有效并且安全性高的治疗方式。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To investigate the feasibility and clinical efficacy of transcatheter arterial embolization using hemostatic clips as the guidance in the patients with peptic ulcer bleeding after endoscopic treatment failure.
      Methods  From February 2009 to October 2018, 33 patients with peptic ulcer bleeding who were treated with transcatheter arterial embolization after endoscopic treatment failure were included in the study. Clinical success rate, 30-d mortality rate and complication rate were observed.
      Results  According to Forrest grading of ulcer bleeding on endoscopy, 8 patients (24.2%) were defined as Ⅰa, 14 patients (42.5%) Ⅰb, 4 patients (12.1%) Ⅱa, and 7 patients (21.2%) Ⅱb. There were 8 patients not given endoscopic treatment due to poor vision. In 25 patients who received endoscopic treatment, 7 patients did not achieve primary endoscopic hemostasis and 18 patients had re-bleeding despite successful primary hemostasis. The mean interval time from endoscopic treatment failure to transcatheter arterial embolization was (35.42±67.54) h. All patients underwent arterial angiography, and 18 patients with positive angiographic findings were treated with embolization. Among the 15 patients with negative angiographic findings, hemostatic clip could be observed fluoroscopically in 8 patients and used as guidance for embolization. Prophylactic embolization was performed in 4 out of 7 patients without visualization of clip fluoroscopically. The clinical success rates in negative angiographic findings patients with and without clip guidance were 75.0% and 28.6% respectively. The clinical success rate with positive angiographic findings was 66.7%. The overall clinical success rate and 30-d mortality rate were 60.0% and 20.0% respectively. No complication related to embolization was observed.
      Conclusion  The preliminary clinical study demonstrates that transcatheter arterial embolization with the guidance of clips is effective and safe for patients with peptic ulcer bleeding after endoscopic treatment failure.

     

© 2020 《四川大学学报(医学版)》编辑部 版权所有 cc

开放获取 本文遵循知识共享署名—非商业性使用4.0国际许可协议(CC BY-NC 4.0),允许第三方对本刊发表的论文自由共享(即在任何媒介以任何形式复制、发行原文)、演绎(即修改、转换或以原文为基础进行创作),必须给出适当的署名,提供指向本文许可协议的链接,同时标明是否对原文作了修改;不得将本文用于商业目的。CC BY-NC 4.0许可协议详情请访问 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

/

返回文章
返回